Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37344236›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2023

Effects of Hallucination Proneness and Sensory Resolution on Prior Biases in Human Perceptual Inference of Time Intervals.

Emeline Duhamel, Andra Mihali, Guillermo Horga

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Evidence for a Primary Prior Deficit as a Mechanism of Auditory Hallucinations.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Emeline DuhamelDepartment of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, New York 10032.
Andra MihaliDepartment of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, New York 10032.
Guillermo HorgaDepartment of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, New York 10032 HorgaG@nyspi.columbia.edu.
New York Psychoanalytic Society and Institute · USUniversité de Rouen Normandie · FR

Funding

Deficient Belief Updating as a Convergent Computational Mechanism of PsychosisR01MH114965 · NIMH · NEW YORK STATE PSYCHIATRIC INSTITUTE DBA RESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR MENTAL HYGIENE, INC · PI HORGA, GUILLERMO · 2018 to 2022
$3.6M
Individualized risk prediction in persons at clinical high-risk for psychosis using neuromelanin-sensitive MRI.R01MH117323 · NIMH · NEW YORK STATE PSYCHIATRIC INSTITUTE DBA RESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR MENTAL HYGIENE, INC · PI HORGA, GUILLERMO · 2018 to 2022
$3.3M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH114965NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH117323
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bayesian models of perception posit that percepts result from the optimal integration of new sensory information and prior expectations. In turn, prominent models of perceptual disturbances in psychosis frame hallucination-like phenomena as percepts excessively biased toward perceptual prior expectations. Despite mounting support for this notion, whether this hallucination-related prior bias results secondarily from imprecise sensory representations at early processing stages or directly from alterations in perceptual priors-both suggested candidates potentially consistent with Bayesian models-remains to be tested. Using modified interval timing paradigms designed to arbitrate between these alternative hypotheses, we show in human participants (16 females and 24 males) from a nonclinical population that hallucination proneness correlates with a circumscribed form of prior bias that reflects selective differences in weighting of contextual prior variance, a prior bias that is unrelated to the effect of sensory noise and to a separate index of sensory resolution. Our results thus suggest distinct mechanisms underlying prior biases in perceptual inference and favor the notion that hallucination proneness could reflect direct alterations in the representation or use of perceptual priors independent of sensory noise.

Indexed as

IllusionsPsychotic DisordersBayes TheoremBiasFemaleHallucinationsHumansMalehallucinationsinterval timingperceptual inferenceprior beliefspsychosissensory resolution

Identifiers

PMID37344236
PMCPMC10359030
OpenAlexW4381488843

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.