Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37345215›Full record

ReviewESC heart failure2023

Roadmap towards an institutional Impella programme for high-risk coronary interventions.

Arkadiusz Pietrasik, Aleksandra Gąsecka, Karolina Jasińska-Gniadzik, Piotr Szwed, Marek Grygier, Tomasz Pawłowski, Jerzy Sacha, Janusz Kochman

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ESC heart failure, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Arkadiusz Pietrasik1st Chair and Department of Cardiology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Aleksandra Gąsecka1st Chair and Department of Cardiology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-5083-7587
Karolina Jasińska-Gniadzik1st Chair and Department of Cardiology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-4361-6609
Piotr Szwed1st Chair and Department of Cardiology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Marek GrygierDepartment of Cardiology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznań, Poland.
Tomasz PawłowskiDepartment of Invasive Cardiology, Central Clinical Hospital of the Ministry of Interior and Administration, Warsaw, Poland.
Jerzy SachaDepartment of Cardiology, University Hospital in Opole, Opole, Poland.
Janusz Kochman1st Chair and Department of Cardiology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Medical University of Warsaw · PLMinistry of Interior and Administration · PLOpole University of Technology · PLPoznan University of Medical Sciences · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coronary artery disease (CAD) and its complications remain the main cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Patients with extensive CAD and multiple comorbidities who require complex, high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (HR-PCI) are at risk of haemodynamic instability and may require short-term mechanical circulatory support (MCS) during the procedure to maintain sufficient perfusion and prevent ischaemia. Impella is a microaxial continuous blood flow pump used for percutaneous support of the left ventricle in patients undergoing HR-PCI. Data from randomized controlled trials and registries suggested an advantage for Impella devices in patients undergoing HR-PCI, compared with other types of MCS. As a thorough understanding of the benefits and drawbacks of the Impella technology is crucial for patient outcomes, we provide a technological overview of Impella and share our experiences gathered during the implementation of institutional Impella programmes in Poland as a roadmap of selection and periprocedural care for patients treated with Impella in the setting of HR-PCI. We propose 10 steps for implementation of an institutional Impella programme for HR-PCI, including (i) dedicated staff training; (ii) standard operating procedure and troubleshooting algorithms prior to the first intervention; (iii) patient selection by the multidisciplinary Heart Team; (iv) patient preparation using multimodality imaging; (v) procedure planning in terms of large-bore access, equipment, and complete revascularization; (vi) starting with HR-PCI support; (vii) starting with femoral artery access in a patient without extensive peripheral artery disease; (viii) multidisciplinary care after the procedure; (ix) haemodynamic and laboratory monitoring to ensure immediate diagnosis of access-site complications, bleeding, haemolysis, acute kidney injury, and infections; and (x) careful revision of every HR-PCI case with the team.

Indexed as

Coronary Artery DiseaseHeart-Assist DevicesPercutaneous Coronary InterventionPeripheral Arterial DiseaseHeart VentriclesHumansCardiogenic shockCoronary interventionImpellaPCI

Identifiers

PMID37345215
PMCPMC10375112
OpenAlexW4381599002

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.