Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37345841›Full record

ReviewThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2023

Low glycaemic index or low glycaemic load diets for people with overweight or obesity.

Khadidja Chekima, See Wan Yan, Shaun Wen Huey Lee, Tziak Ze Wong, Mohd Ismail Noor, Yasmin Bh Ooi, Maria-Inti Metzendorf, Nai Ming Lai

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Impact of weight-loss interventions on psoriasis severity: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Khadidja ChekimaSchool of Biosciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Taylor's University, Subang Jaya, Malaysia.
See Wan YanSchool of Hospitality Management, Macao Institute for Tourism Studies, Macao, Macao.
Shaun Wen Huey LeeSchool of Pharmacy, Monash University Malaysia, Bandar Sunway, Malaysia.
Tziak Ze WongSchool of Food Studies and Gastronomy, Taylor's University, Subang Jaya, Malaysia.
Mohd Ismail NoorSchool of Culinary Arts and Food Studies, Taylor's University, Subang Jaya, Malaysia.
Yasmin Bh OoiFaculty of Food Science and Nutrition, University Malaysia Sabah (UMS), Kota Kinabalu, Malaysia.
Maria-Inti MetzendorfInstitute of General Practice, Medical Faculty of the Heinrich-Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Nai Ming LaiSchool of Medicine, Taylor's University, Subang Jaya, Malaysia.
Taylor's University · MYHeinrich Heine University Düsseldorf · DEMacao Polytechnic University · MOMonash University Malaysia · MYUniversiti of Malaysia Sabah · MY

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe prevalence of obesity is increasing worldwide, yet nutritional management remains contentious. It has been suggested that low glycaemic index (GI) or low glycaemic load (GL) diets may stimulate greater weight loss than higher GI/GL diets or other weight reduction diets. The previous version of this review, published in 2007, found mainly short-term intervention studies. Since then, randomised controlled trials (RCTs) with longer-term follow-up have become available, warranting an update of this review.

objectivesTo assess the effects of low glycaemic index or low glycaemic load diets on weight loss in people with overweight or obesity. SEARCH

methodsWe searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, one other database, and two clinical trials registers from their inception to 25 May 2022. We did not apply any language restrictions. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included RCTs with a minimum duration of eight weeks comparing low GI/GL diets to higher GI/GL diets or any other diets in people with overweight or obesity. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standard Cochrane methods. We conducted two main comparisons: low GI/GL diets versus higher GI/GL diets and low GI/GL diets versus any other diet. Our main outcomes included change in body weight and body mass index, adverse events, health-related quality of life, and mortality. We used GRADE to assess the certainty of the evidence for each outcome. MAIN

resultsIn this updated review, we included 10 studies (1210 participants); nine were newly-identified studies. We included only one study from the previous version of this review, following a revision of inclusion criteria. We listed five studies as 'awaiting classification' and one study as 'ongoing'. Of the 10 included studies, seven compared low GI/GL diets (233 participants) with higher GI/GL diets (222 participants) and three studies compared low GI/GL diets (379 participants) with any other diet (376 participants). One study included children (50 participants); one study included adults aged over 65 years (24 participants); the remaining studies included adults (1136 participants). The duration of the interventions varied from eight weeks to 18 months. All trials had an unclear or high risk of bias across several domains.  Low GI/GL diets versus higher GI/GL diets Low GI/GL diets probably result in little to no difference in change in body weight compared to higher GI/GL diets (mean difference (MD) -0.82 kg, 95% confidence interval (CI) -1.92 to 0.28; I

Indexed as

Glycemic LoadOverweightAdultAgedBlood GlucoseBody WeightChildDietGlycemic IndexHumansObesityBlood Glucose

Identifiers

PMID37345841
PMCPMC10313499
OpenAlexW4381597849

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.