Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37346641›Full record

ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2023

Predicting medical device failure: a promise to reduce healthcare facilities cost through smart healthcare management.

Noorul Husna Abd Rahman, Muhammad Hazim Mohamad Zaki, Khairunnisa Hasikin, Nasrul Anuar Abd Razak, Ayman Khaleel Ibrahim, Khin Wee Lai

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
15.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Noorul Husna Abd RahmanDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Universiti Malaya, Lembah Pantai, Wilayah Persekutuan Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Muhammad Hazim Mohamad ZakiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Universiti Malaya, Lembah Pantai, Wilayah Persekutuan Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Khairunnisa HasikinDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Universiti Malaya, Lembah Pantai, Wilayah Persekutuan Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Nasrul Anuar Abd RazakDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Universiti Malaya, Lembah Pantai, Wilayah Persekutuan Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Ayman Khaleel IbrahimFaculty of Computing and Informatics, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia.
Khin Wee LaiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Universiti Malaya, Lembah Pantai, Wilayah Persekutuan Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0002-8602-0533
University of Malaya · MYMinistry of Health · MYUniversiti of Malaysia Sabah · MY

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The advancement of biomedical research generates myriad healthcare-relevant data, including medical records and medical device maintenance information. The COVID-19 pandemic significantly affects the global mortality rate, creating an enormous demand for medical devices. As information technology has advanced, the concept of intelligent healthcare has steadily gained prominence. Smart healthcare utilises a new generation of information technologies, such as the Internet of Things (loT), big data, cloud computing, and artificial intelligence, to completely transform the traditional medical system. With the intention of presenting the concept of smart healthcare, a predictive model is proposed to predict medical device failure for intelligent management of healthcare services. Methods: Present healthcare device management can be improved by proposing a predictive machine learning model that prognosticates the tendency of medical device failures toward smart healthcare. The predictive model is developed based on 8,294 critical medical devices from 44 different types of equipment extracted from 15 healthcare facilities in Malaysia. The model classifies the device into three classes; (i) class 1, where the device is unlikely to fail within the first 3 years of purchase, (ii) class 2, where the device is likely to fail within 3 years from purchase date, and (iii) class 3 where the device is likely to fail more than 3 years after purchase. The goal is to establish a precise maintenance schedule and reduce maintenance and resource costs based on the time to the first failure event. A machine learning and deep learning technique were compared, and the best robust model for smart healthcare was proposed. Results: This study compares five algorithms in machine learning and three optimizers in deep learning techniques. The best optimized predictive model is based on ensemble classifier and SGDM optimizer, respectively. An ensemble classifier model produces 77.90%, 87.60%, and 75.39% for accuracy, specificity, and precision compared to 70.30%, 83.71%, and 67.15% for deep learning models. The ensemble classifier model improves to 79.50%, 88.36%, and 77.43% for accuracy, specificity, and precision after significant features are identified. The result concludes although machine learning has better accuracy than deep learning, more training time is required, which is 11.49 min instead of 1 min 5 s when deep learning is applied. The model accuracy shall be improved by introducing unstructured data from maintenance notes and is considered the author's future work because dealing with text data is time-consuming. The proposed model has proven to improve the devices' maintenance strategy with a Malaysian Ringgit (MYR) cost reduction of approximately MYR 326,330.88 per year. Therefore, the maintenance cost would drastically decrease if this smart predictive model is included in the healthcare management system.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceDeep learningMachine learningMaintenance costMedical device failure predictionMedical device maintenanceSmart healthcare

Identifiers

PMID37346641
PMCPMC10280478
OpenAlexW4362590296

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.