Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37349869›Full record

SynthesisPublic health nutrition2023

Caregiver perceptions of nutrition interventions in infants and children under 24 months of age: a systematic review.

Isabella Stelle, Mai-Lei Woo Kinshella, Sophie E Moore

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Public health nutrition, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Isabella StelleDepartment of Women and Children's Health, King's College London, St Thomas' Hospital, Westminster Bridge Rd, LondonSE1 7EH, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2023-7614
Mai-Lei Woo KinshellaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology and BC Children's Hospital Research Institute, University of British Columbia, VancouverBC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5846-3014
Sophie E MooreDepartment of Women and Children's Health, King's College London, St Thomas' Hospital, Westminster Bridge Rd, LondonSE1 7EH, UK.
St Thomas' Hospital · GBBC Children's Hospital · CA

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_U123292701Medical Research Council MC_UP_1005/1Medical Research Council MR/P012019/1Wellcome Trust 220225/Z/20/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveEfficacy studies show early nutrition interventions improving infant nutrition status, but understanding caregiver acceptability is required for implementation of such interventions. This systematic review examines caregivers' perceptions of nutrition interventions in young children.

designWe searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL and PsychINFO from date of online journal inception through December 2020. Interventions included oral (powder/liquid/tablet) and/or intravenous supplementation, food fortification and nutrition counselling. Inclusion criteria included primary research, data presented on caregiver perception and studies published in English. Quality assessment was performed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme tool. Studies underwent narrative synthesis using inductive thematic analysis.

settingNo restriction.

participantsCaregivers of children under 24 months of age.

resultsOf 11 798 records identified, thirty-seven publications were included. Interventions included oral supplementation, food fortification and nutrition counselling. Caregivers included mothers (83 %), fathers, grandparents and aunts. Perceptions were gathered through individual interviews, focus group discussions, questionnaires, surveys and ratings. Totally, 89 % of studies noted high acceptability (

conclusionsPositive perceptions and enthusiasm for interventions were frequently reported. Key to implementation was the increased appetite noted by caregivers. A substantial proportion of studies reported negative perceptions, mainly due to side effects. In future interventions, mitigation and education around common side effects are crucial for acceptability. Understanding both positive and negative caregiver perceptions is important for informing future nutrition interventions and strengthening sustainability and implementation.

Indexed as

CaregiversMothersChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantInfant Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaAcceptabilityCaregiversInfantsNutrition interventionsQualitative

Identifiers

PMID37349869
PMCPMC10478058
OpenAlexW4381716524

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.