Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37350646›Full record

ArticleChemical senses2023

Covid-19 affects taste independent of taste-smell confusions: results from a combined chemosensory home test and online survey from a large global cohort.

Ha Nguyen, Javier Albayay, Richard Höchenberger, Surabhi Bhutani, Sanne Boesveldt, Niko A Busch, Ilja Croijmans, Keiland W Cooper, Jasper H B de Groot, Michael C Farruggia and 11 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chemical senses, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Unique and shared patterns of chemosensory dysfunction distinguish chronic COVID-19 and aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease.Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Life satisfaction among cancer survivors with and without smell and taste dysfunction: evidence from the National Health Interview Survey.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Home screening of taste and oral trigeminal function: a feasibility study.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2024
    Article
  9. Mechanisms of COVID-19-associated olfactory dysfunction.Neuropathology and applied neurobiology · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Subjective versus Psychophysical Measures of Chemosensory Alterations following COVID-19.ORL; journal for oto-rhino-laryngology and its related specialties · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 15 institutions in 8 countries.

Ha NguyenMonell Chemical Senses Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Javier AlbayayCentro Interdipartimentale Mente/Cervello, Università degli Studi di Trento, Rovereto, Italy.
Richard HöchenbergerInria, CEA, MIND, Université Paris-Saclay, Palaiseau, France.ORCID 0000-0002-0380-4798
Surabhi BhutaniSchool of Exercise and Nutritional Sciences, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, USA.
Sanne BoesveldtDivision of Human Nutrition and Health, Wageningen University, Wageningen, Netherlands.
Niko A BuschInstitute for Psychology, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.
Ilja CroijmansDepartment of Language and Communication, Radboud University, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Keiland W CooperDepartment of Neurobiology and Behavior, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA.
Jasper H B de GrootBehavioural Science Institute, Radboud University, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Michael C FarruggiaDepartment of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Alexander W FjaeldstadDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Flavour Clinic, University Clinic for Flavour, Balance and Sleep, Gødstrup Regional Hospital, Herning, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-9135-6920
John E HayesDepartment of Food Science, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9065-6326
Thomas HummelDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Dresden Medical School, Smell & Taste Clinic, Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9713-0183
Paule V JosephNational Institutes of Health, National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, DIBCR, Section of Sensory Science and Metabolism, Bethesda, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1198-9622
Tatiana K LaktionovaInstitute of Ecology and Evolution RAS, A N Severtsov, Moscow, Russia.
Thierry Thomas-DanguinResearch Center for Smell Taste and Feeding Behavior, INRAE CSGA, Dijon, France.
Maria G VeldhuizenDepartment of Anatomy, Mersin Universitesi, Mersin, Turkey.
Vera V VoznessenskayaInstitute of Ecology and Evolution RAS, A N Severtsov, Moscow, Russia.
Valentina ParmaMonell Chemical Senses Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0276-7072
M Yanina PepinoDepartment of Food Science and Human Nutrition, Division of Nutritional Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2381-1095
Kathrin OhlaDepartment of Food Science, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7265-0449
Monell Chemical Senses Center · USPennsylvania State University · USRadboud University Nijmegen · NLSevertsov Institute of Ecology and Evolution · RUCommissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives · FRInstitut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement · FRMersin Üniversitesi · TRNational Institutes of Health · USSan Diego State University · USUniversity of California, Irvine · USUniversity of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · USUniversity of Münster · DEUniversity of Trento · ITWageningen University & Research · NLYale University · US

Funding

Sensory Science and Metabolism; Molecular and Neuronal MechanismsZIANR000035 · NINR · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NURSING RESEARCH · PI JOSEPH, PAULE · 2018 to 2020
$1.7M
Rapid olfactory tools for telemedicine-friendly COVID-19 screening and surveillanceU01DC019573 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI GERKIN, RICHARD C, HAYES, JOHN EDWARD · 2021 to 2021
$901k
Chemosensation and COVID-19ZIAAA000138 · NIAAA · NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON ALCOHOL ABUSE AND ALCOHOLISM · PI JOSEPH, PAULE · 2022 to 2024
$188k
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA NR000035NIAAA NIH HHS Z01AA000135NIDCD NIH HHS U01 DC019573NINR NIH HHS 1ZIANR000035-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

People often confuse smell loss with taste loss, so it is unclear how much gustatory function is reduced in patients self-reporting taste loss. Our pre-registered cross-sectional study design included an online survey in 12 languages with instructions for self-administering chemosensory tests with 10 household items. Between June 2020 and March 2021, 10,953 individuals participated. Of these, 5,225 self-reported a respiratory illness and were grouped based on their reported COVID test results: COVID-positive (COVID+, N = 3,356), COVID-negative (COVID-, N = 602), and COVID unknown for those waiting for a test result (COVID?, N = 1,267). The participants who reported no respiratory illness were grouped by symptoms: sudden smell/taste changes (STC, N = 4,445), other symptoms excluding smell or taste changes (OthS, N = 832), and no symptoms (NoS, N = 416). Taste, smell, and oral irritation intensities and self-assessed abilities were rated on visual analog scales. Compared to the NoS group, COVID+ was associated with a 21% reduction in taste (95% confidence interval (CI): 15-28%), 47% in smell (95% CI: 37-56%), and 17% in oral irritation (95% CI: 10-25%) intensity. There were medium to strong correlations between perceived intensities and self-reported abilities (r = 0.84 for smell, r = 0.68 for taste, and r = 0.37 for oral irritation). Our study demonstrates that COVID-19-positive individuals report taste dysfunction when self-tested with stimuli that have little to none olfactory components. Assessing the smell and taste intensity of household items is a promising, cost-effective screening tool that complements self-reports and may help to disentangle taste loss from smell loss. However, it does not replace standardized validated psychophysical tests.

Indexed as

AgeusiaCOVID-19Olfaction DisordersAnosmiaCross-Sectional StudiesHumansSARS-CoV-2SmellTasteTaste Disordersageusiaanosmiachemesthesisgustationolfactiontaste–smell confusion

Identifiers

PMID37350646
PMCPMC10396355
OpenAlexW4381716535

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.