Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37353603›Full record

ArticleCommunications medicine2023

Rapidly adaptable automated interpretation of point-of-care COVID-19 diagnostics.

Siddarth Arumugam, Jiawei Ma, Uzay Macar, Guangxing Han, Kathrine McAulay, Darrell Ingram, Alex Ying, Harshit Harpaldas Chellani, Terry Chern, Kenta Reilly and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Siddarth Arumugam *Department of Biomedical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, NY, 10027, USA.
Jiawei Ma *Department of Computer Science, Columbia University, New York, NY, 10027, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8625-5391
Uzay MacarDepartment of Computer Science, Columbia University, New York, NY, 10027, USA.
Guangxing HanDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, NY, 10027, USA.
Kathrine McAulayDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, 85054, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3817-9857
Darrell IngramSafe Health Systems, Inc., Los Angeles, CA, 90036, USA.
Alex YingDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, NY, 10027, USA.
Harshit Harpaldas ChellaniDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, NY, 10027, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9737-3932
Terry ChernDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, NY, 10027, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3497-5220
Kenta ReillyDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, 85054, USA.
David A M ColburnDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, NY, 10027, USA.
Robert StanciuDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, NY, 10027, USA.
Craig DuffySafe Health Systems, Inc., Los Angeles, CA, 90036, USA.
Ashley WilliamsSafe Health Systems, Inc., Los Angeles, CA, 90036, USA.
Thomas GrysDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, 85054, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0503-124X
Shih-Fu ChangDepartment of Computer Science, Columbia University, New York, NY, 10027, USA. sc250@columbia.edu.
Samuel K SiaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, NY, 10027, USA. ss2735@columbia.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0230-3542
Columbia University · USMayo Clinic Hospital · USSubstance Abuse Free Environment · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPoint-of-care diagnostic devices, such as lateral-flow assays, are becoming widely used by the public. However, efforts to ensure correct assay operation and result interpretation rely on hardware that cannot be easily scaled or image processing approaches requiring large training datasets, necessitating large numbers of tests and expert labeling with validated specimens for every new test kit format.

methodsWe developed a software architecture called AutoAdapt POC that integrates automated membrane extraction, self-supervised learning, and few-shot learning to automate the interpretation of POC diagnostic tests using smartphone cameras in a scalable manner. A base model pre-trained on a single LFA kit is adapted to five different COVID-19 tests (three antigen, two antibody) using just 20 labeled images.

resultsHere we show AutoAdapt POC to yield 99% to 100% accuracy over 726 tests (350 positive, 376 negative). In a COVID-19 drive-through study with 74 untrained users self-testing, 98% found image collection easy, and the rapidly adapted models achieved classification accuracies of 100% on both COVID-19 antigen and antibody test kits. Compared with traditional visual interpretation on 105 test kit results, the algorithm correctly identified 100% of images; without a false negative as interpreted by experts. Finally, compared to a traditional convolutional neural network trained on an HIV test kit, the algorithm showed high accuracy while requiring only 1/50th of the training images.

conclusionsThe study demonstrates how rapid domain adaptation in machine learning can provide quality assurance, linkage to care, and public health tracking for untrained users across diverse POC diagnostic tests.

Identifiers

PMID37353603
PMCPMC10290128
OpenAlexW4381737068

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.