Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37353679›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Cancer2023

Micro-engineering and nano-engineering approaches to investigate tumour ecosystems.

Mijin Kim, Magdalini Panagiotakopoulou, Chen Chen, Stephen B Ruiz, Karuna Ganesh, Tuomas Tammela, Daniel A Heller

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Cancer, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Frontiers in genetics · 2025
    Review
  13. Advancing cancer research through organoid technology.Journal of translational medicine · 2024
    Review
  14. Bottom-up synthetic immunology.Nature nanotechnology · 2024
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mijin KimMolecular Pharmacology Program, Sloan Kettering Institute, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7781-9466
Magdalini PanagiotakopoulouMolecular Pharmacology Program, Sloan Kettering Institute, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6293-4579
Chen ChenMolecular Pharmacology Program, Sloan Kettering Institute, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4803-0183
Stephen B RuizMolecular Pharmacology Program, Sloan Kettering Institute, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1634-9798
Karuna GaneshMolecular Pharmacology Program, Sloan Kettering Institute, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4948-1082
Tuomas TammelaGraduate School of Medical Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3675-6961
Daniel A HellerMolecular Pharmacology Program, Sloan Kettering Institute, New York, NY, USA. hellerd@mskcc.org.ORCID 0000-0002-6866-0000
Cornell University · USKettering University · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI SELWYN M VICKERS · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
CANCER PHARMACOLOGYT32CA062948 · NCI · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI LORRAINE J GUDAS · 1994 to 2026
$12.1M
P-selectin-Mediated Targeting of PI3K Nanomedicines to the Tumor MicroenvironmentR01CA215719 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI HELLER, DANIEL ALAN · 2018 to 2022
$3.1M
Tumor-Selective Delivery Approaches for MedulloblastomaR01NS116353 · NINDS · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI HELLER, DANIEL ALAN, RAJU, PRAVEEN B. · 2020 to 2024
$3.1M
Inducing Neural Maturation in Medulloblastoma by Targeting EZH2R01NS122987 · NINDS · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI RAJU, PRAVEEN B., SNUDERL, MATIJA · 2022 to 2025
$2.8M
Nanotechnology as a therapeutic approach in arteriovenous fistula maturationR01DK129299 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI JAIMES, EDGAR A, SHIU, YAN-TING E. · 2021 to 2024
$1.7M
Machine Perception Nanosensor Array Platform to Capture Whole Disease Fingerprints of Early Stage Pancreatic CancerK99EB033580 · NIBIB · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI KIM, MIJIN · 2022 to 2023
$199k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS R01 CA215719NCI NIH HHS T32 CA062948NIBIB NIH HHS K99 EB033580NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK129299NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS116353NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS122987
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The interactions among tumour cells, the tumour microenvironment (TME) and non-tumour tissues are of interest to many cancer researchers. Micro-engineering approaches and nanotechnologies are under extensive exploration for modelling these interactions and measuring them in situ and in vivo to investigate therapeutic vulnerabilities in cancer and extend a systemic view of tumour ecosystems. Here we highlight the greatest opportunities for improving the understanding of tumour ecosystems using microfluidic devices, bioprinting or organ-on-a-chip approaches. We also discuss the potential of nanosensors that can transmit information from within the TME or elsewhere in the body to address scientific and clinical questions about changes in chemical gradients, enzymatic activities, metabolic and immune profiles of the TME and circulating analytes. This Review aims to connect the cancer biology and engineering communities, presenting biomedical technologies that may expand the methodologies of the former, while inspiring the latter to develop approaches for interrogating cancer ecosystems.

Indexed as

EcosystemNeoplasmsHumansTumor Microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID37353679
PMCPMC10528361
OpenAlexW4381739423

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.