Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37353749›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2023

Development of machine learning models to predict gestational diabetes risk in the first half of pregnancy.

Gabriel Cubillos, Max Monckeberg, Alejandra Plaza, Maria Morgan, Pablo A Estevez, Mahesh Choolani, Matthew W Kemp, Sebastian E Illanes, Claudio A Perez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Journal of clinical medicine · 2025
    Review
  13. Artificial Intelligence in Gestational Diabetes Care: A Systematic Review.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Gabriel CubillosDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Universidad de Chile, Av. Tupper 2007, 8370451, Santiago, Chile.
Max MonckebergDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Laboratory of Reproductive Biology, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad de los Andes, 7620001, Santiago, Chile.
Alejandra PlazaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Laboratory of Reproductive Biology, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad de los Andes, 7620001, Santiago, Chile.
Maria MorganDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Laboratory of Reproductive Biology, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad de los Andes, 7620001, Santiago, Chile.
Pablo A EstevezDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Universidad de Chile, Av. Tupper 2007, 8370451, Santiago, Chile.
Mahesh ChoolaniDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, NUS Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, 1E Kent Ridge Road, NUHS Tower Block, Level 12, Singapore, 119228, Singapore.
Matthew W KempDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, NUS Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, 1E Kent Ridge Road, NUHS Tower Block, Level 12, Singapore, 119228, Singapore.
Sebastian E IllanesIMPACT, Center of Interventional Medicine for Precision and Advanced Cellular Therapy, Santiago, Chile. sillanes@uandes.cl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5433-9315
Claudio A PerezDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Universidad de Chile, Av. Tupper 2007, 8370451, Santiago, Chile. clperez@ing.uchile.cl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5484-4159

Funding

Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo Basal funding for Scientific and Technological Center of Excellence, IMPACT, #FB210024, FONDECYT 1231675
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEarly prediction of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM) risk is of particular importance as it may enable more efficacious interventions and reduce cumulative injury to mother and fetus. The aim of this study is to develop machine learning (ML) models, for the early prediction of GDM using widely available variables, facilitating early intervention, and making possible to apply the prediction models in places where there is no access to more complex examinations.

methodsThe dataset used in this study includes registries from 1,611 pregnancies. Twelve different ML models and their hyperparameters were optimized to achieve early and high prediction performance of GDM. A data augmentation method was used in training to improve prediction results. Three methods were used to select the most relevant variables for GDM prediction. After training, the models ranked with the highest Area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUCROC), were assessed on the validation set. Models with the best results were assessed in the test set as a measure of generalization performance.

resultsOur method allows identifying many possible models for various levels of sensitivity and specificity. Four models achieved a high sensitivity of 0.82, a specificity in the range 0.72-0.74, accuracy between 0.73-0.75, and AUCROC of 0.81. These models required between 7 and 12 input variables. Another possible choice could be a model with sensitivity of 0.89 that requires just 5 variables reaching an accuracy of 0.65, a specificity of 0.62, and AUCROC of 0.82.

conclusionsThe principal findings of our study are: Early prediction of GDM within early stages of pregnancy using regular examinations/exams; the development and optimization of twelve different ML models and their hyperparameters to achieve the highest prediction performance; a novel data augmentation method is proposed to allow reaching excellent GDM prediction results with various models.

Indexed as

Diabetes, GestationalFemaleHumansMachine LearningPregnancyProspective StudiesROC CurveSensitivity and SpecificityData augmentationGDM risk predictionGestational diabetes mellitus (GDM)Machine learning modelsWidely available variables

Identifiers

PMID37353749
PMCPMC10288662

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.