Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37357248›Full record

ArticleAnnals of biomedical engineering2023

A Correspondence-Based Network Approach for Groupwise Analysis of Patient-Specific Spatiotemporal Data.

Penny R Atkins, Alan Morris, Shireen Y Elhabian, Andrew E Anderson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. MASSM: An End-to-End Deep Learning Framework for Multi-Anatomy Statistical Shape Modeling Directly From Images.Shape in medical imaging : International Workshop, ShapeMI 2024, held in conjunction with MICCAI 2024, Marrakesh, Morocco, October 6, 2024, Proceedings. ShapeMI (Workshop) (2024 : Marrakech, Morocco) · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Penny R AtkinsScientific Computing and Imaging Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Alan MorrisScientific Computing and Imaging Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Shireen Y ElhabianScientific Computing and Imaging Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Andrew E AndersonScientific Computing and Imaging Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA. aea4@utah.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4708-2608

Funding

Population-Based Shape and Biomechanical Analysis of Hip PathoanatomyR01EB016701 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI ANDERSON, ANDREW EDWARD · 2013 to 2023
$3.6M
ShapeWorks in the CloudR01AR076120 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI ELHABIAN, SHIREEN YOUSSEF · 2019 to 2024
$2.7M
ShapeWorksStudio: An Integrative, User-Friendly, and Scalable Suite for Shape Representation and AnalysisU24EB029011 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI ELHABIAN, SHIREEN YOUSSEF · 2019 to 2023
$1.4M
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR076120NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB016701NIBIB NIH HHS U24 EB029011
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Methods for statistically analyzing patient-specific data that vary both spatially and over time are currently either limited to summary statistics or require elaborate surface registration. We propose a new method, called correspondence-based network analysis, which leverages particle-based shape modeling to establish correspondence across a population and preserve patient-specific measurements and predictions through statistical analysis. Herein, we evaluated this method using three published datasets of the hip describing cortical bone thickness of the proximal femur, cartilage contact stress, and dynamic joint space between control and patient cohorts to evaluate activity- and group-based differences, as applicable, using traditional statistical parametric mapping (SPM) and our proposed spatially considerate correspondence-based network analysis approach. The network approach was insensitive to correspondence density, while the traditional application of SPM showed decreasing area of the region of significance with increasing correspondence density. In comparison to SPM, the network approach identified broader and more connected regions of significance for all three datasets. The correspondence-based network analysis approach identified differences between groups and activities without loss of subject and spatial specificity which could improve clinical interpretation of results.

Indexed as

Cortical BoneFemurHumansJointsLower ExtremityAnatomic analysisBiomechanicsParticle-based shape modelStatistical parametric mappingSubject-specific analysis

Identifiers

PMID37357248
PMCPMC11047278

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.