Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37358475›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of cell biology2023

FREEDA: An automated computational pipeline guides experimental testing of protein innovation.

Damian Dudka, R Brian Akins, Michael A Lampson

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of cell biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Damian DudkaDepartment of Biology, School of Arts and Sciences, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0638-969X
R Brian AkinsDepartment of Biology, School of Arts and Sciences, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1310-0185
Michael A LampsonDepartment of Biology, School of Arts and Sciences, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2825-1894
University of the Arts · US

Funding

Cell Biological mechanisms of centromere driveR35GM122475 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Michael Lampson · 2017 to 2026
$4.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM122475
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cell biologists typically focus on conserved regions of a protein, overlooking innovations that can shape its function over evolutionary time. Computational analyses can reveal potential innovations by detecting statistical signatures of positive selection that lead to rapid accumulation of beneficial mutations. However, these approaches are not easily accessible to non-specialists, limiting their use in cell biology. Here, we present an automated computational pipeline FREEDA that provides a simple graphical user interface requiring only a gene name; integrates widely used molecular evolution tools to detect positive selection in rodents, primates, carnivores, birds, and flies; and maps results onto protein structures predicted by AlphaFold. Applying FREEDA to >100 centromere proteins, we find statistical evidence of positive selection within loops and turns of ancient domains, suggesting innovation of essential functions. As a proof-of-principle experiment, we show innovation in centromere binding of mouse CENP-O. Overall, we provide an accessible computational tool to guide cell biology research and apply it to experimentally demonstrate functional innovation.

Indexed as

CentromereComputational BiologyComputer SimulationEvolution, MolecularProteinsAnimalsBirdsCell BiologyChromosomal Proteins, Non-HistoneDrosophilaMicePrimatesProtein DomainsRatsChromosomal Proteins, Non-HistoneProteins

Identifiers

PMID37358475
PMCPMC10292211
OpenAlexW4382011068

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.