Evidence mapPaperPMID 37359018Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in medicine2023

The effects of probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics on polycystic ovarian syndrome: an overview of systematic reviews.

Pooneh Angoorani, Hanieh-Sadat Ejtahed, Fateme Ettehad Marvasti, MinaSadat Taghavi, Behzad Mohammadpour Ahranjani, Shirin Hasani-Ranjbar, Bagher Larijani

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
7.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Pooneh AngooraniObesity and Eating Habits Research Center, Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinical Sciences Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Hanieh-Sadat EjtahedObesity and Eating Habits Research Center, Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinical Sciences Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Fateme Ettehad MarvastiObesity and Eating Habits Research Center, Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinical Sciences Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
MinaSadat TaghaviObesity and Eating Habits Research Center, Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinical Sciences Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Behzad Mohammadpour AhranjaniDepartment of Pediatric Cardiology, Bahrami Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Shirin Hasani-RanjbarObesity and Eating Habits Research Center, Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinical Sciences Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Bagher LarijaniEndocrinology and Metabolism Research Center, Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinical Sciences Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Tehran University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Accumulating evidence has highlighted the critical role of the gut microbiota and its potential action as a regulator of metabolic disorders including insulin resistance, obesity, and systemic inflammation in polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS). Microbiota-modulating interventions, such as probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics, could be effective in PCOS management. Methods: We conducted an overview of systematic reviews (SRs) and meta-analyses to summarize reviews regarding the effectiveness of probiotics/prebiotics/synbiotics on the management of PCOS through a systematic literature search in PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases until September 2021. Results: Eight SRs and meta-analyses were included in this study. Our overview confirmed that probiotic supplementation had a potentially beneficial effect on some PCOS-related parameters including body mass index (BMI), fasting plasma glucose (FPG), and lipid profiles. Evidence shows that synbiotics in comparison with probiotics were less effective on these parameters. The methodological quality of SRs was assessed using the AMSTAR-2 assessment tool and was determined as high for four SRs, low for two SRs, and critically low for one SR. Due to limited evidence and high heterogeneity of the studies, it remains difficult to identify optimal probiotics strains, prebiotics types, length of duration, and doses. Discussion: Future clinical trials with higher quality are recommended to clarify the efficacy of probiotics/prebiotics/synbiotics on the management of PCOS and provide more accurate evidence.

Indexed as

gut microbiotapolycystic ovarian syndromeprebioticsprobioticssynbiotics

Identifiers

PMID37359018
PMCPMC10288857
OpenAlexW4380088291

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.