Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37362824›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of general medicine2023

Comparison of Different Systemic Inflammatory Markers in Predicting Clinical Outcomes with Syntax Score in Patients with Non-ST Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Retrospective Study.

Hong Li, Shuai Meng, Weiguang Chen, Xuan Lei, Xiangyun Kong, Huagang Zhu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of general medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Hong LiEmergency & Critical Care Center, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Shuai MengDepartment of Cardiology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Weiguang ChenDepartment of Cardiology, 1st Hospital Affiliated of Hebei North University, Zhangjiakou, Hebei Province, People's Republic of China.
Xuan LeiDepartment of Cardiology, Beijing Chest Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Xiangyun KongDepartment of General Medicine, Beijing Luhe Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Huagang ZhuDepartment of Cardiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-2904-6331
Capital Medical University · CNBeijing Luhe Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University · CNHebei North University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The clinical value of the Syntax score in patients with non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) has been well established. The neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), the platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), the high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP)-albumin ratio (hsCAR), and systemic immune-inflammatory (SII) index are promising systemic inflammation (SI) biomarkers in coronary artery diseases. However, studies which compare the predicting value of these SI indicators with the Syntax score in NSTEMI patients are limited. Material and Methods: NSTEMI patients who underwent coronary angiography (CAG) in our department were retrospectively enrolled. Both univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to evaluate the clinical value between SI biomarkers and Syntax score in these patients. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) was used to compare the clinical values of these parameters in predicting 6-month major cardiovascular events (MACE) and over-all mortality. Results: A total of 429 NSTEMI patients were finally enrolled in this study. The level of NLR, PLR, as well as hsCAR, and SII in patients with high Syntax scores, are significantly higher than patients with the low Syntax score. Multivariable logistic regression analysis demonstrated that all of the SI indicators but not the Syntax score were the independent risk factors of 6-month MACE in NSTEMI patients. ROC showed that all of the SI indicators had better predictive value than the Syntax score in these patients (0.637, 0.592, 0.631, 0.590, 0.559, respectively) in predicting MACE and similar predictive value in over-all mortality (0.530, 0.524, 0.761, 0.553, 0.620, respectively). Conclusion: Novel SI biomarkers including NLR, PLR, hsCAR, and SII have better predictive value in MACE and similar predictive value in over-all mortality compared with Syntax score in NSTEMI patients.

Indexed as

high-sensitivity C-reactive protein–albumin rationeutrophil–lymphocyte rationon-ST segment elevation myocardial infarctionplatelet–lymphocyte ratio

Identifiers

PMID37362824
PMCPMC10289247
OpenAlexW4381252766

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.