Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37367271›Full record

ReviewJournal of functional biomaterials2023

Guided Bone Regeneration Using a Novel Magnesium Membrane: A Literature Review and a Report of Two Cases in Humans.

Marko Blašković, Ivana Butorac Prpić, Dorotea Blašković, Patrick Rider, Matej Tomas, Slavko Čandrlić, David Botond Hangyasi, Marija Čandrlić, Željka Perić Kačarević

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of functional biomaterials, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Research status and prospects of biodegradable magnesium-based metal guided bone regeneration membranes.Hua xi kou qiang yi xue za zhi = Huaxi kouqiang yixue zazhi = West China journal of stomatology · 2024
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Marko BlaškovićDepartment of Oral Surgery, Faculty of Dental Medicine Rijeka, University of Rijeka, Krešimirova 40/42, 51 000 Rijeka, Croatia.
Ivana Butorac PrpićDepartment of Dental Medicine, Faculty of Dental Medicine and Health Osijek, J.J. Strossmayer University of Osijek, Crkvena 21, 31 000 Osijek, Croatia.
Dorotea BlaškovićDental Clinic Blašković, Linićeva ulica 16, 51 000 Rijeka, Croatia.
Patrick RiderBotiss Biomaterials GmbH, 15806 Zossen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3620-7199
Matej TomasDepartment of Dental Medicine, Faculty of Dental Medicine and Health Osijek, J.J. Strossmayer University of Osijek, Crkvena 21, 31 000 Osijek, Croatia.ORCID 0000-0002-7933-3371
Slavko ČandrlićDepartment of Interdisciplinary Areas, Faculty of Dental Medicine and Health Osijek, J.J. Strossmayer University of Osijek, Crkvena 21, 31 000 Osijek, Croatia.
David Botond HangyasiDepartment of Periodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Szeged, Tisza Lajos krt. 64-66, H-6720 Szeged, Hungary.
Marija ČandrlićDepartment of Dental Medicine, Faculty of Dental Medicine and Health Osijek, J.J. Strossmayer University of Osijek, Crkvena 21, 31 000 Osijek, Croatia.ORCID 0000-0003-2932-7157
Željka Perić KačarevićBotiss Biomaterials GmbH, 15806 Zossen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Guided bone regeneration (GBR) is a common procedure used to rebuild dimensional changes in the alveolar ridge that occur after extraction. In GBR, membranes are used to separate the bone defect from the underlying soft tissue. To overcome the shortcomings of commonly used membranes in GBR, a new resorbable magnesium membrane has been developed. A literature search was performed via MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science and PubMed in February 2023 for research on magnesium barrier membranes. Of the 78 records reviewed, 16 studies met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed. In addition, this paper reports two cases where GBR was performed using a magnesium membrane and magnesium fixation system with immediate and delayed implant placement. No adverse reactions to the biomaterials were detected, and the membrane was completely resorbed after healing. The resorbable fixation screws used in both cases held the membranes in place during bone formation and were completely resorbed. Therefore, the pure magnesium membrane and magnesium fixation screws were found to be excellent biomaterials for GBR, which supports the findings of the literature review.

Indexed as

biodegradablebone regenerationdental implantmagnesium membranemagnesium screws

Identifiers

PMID37367271
PMCPMC10299229

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.