Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37370790›Full record

ArticleCancers2023

Cetuximab for Immunotherapy-Refractory/Ineligible Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Julian A Marin-Acevedo, Bethany M Withycombe, Youngchul Kim, Andrew S Brohl, Zeynep Eroglu, Joseph Markowitz, Ahmad A Tarhini, Kenneth Y Tsai, Nikhil I Khushalani

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Julian A Marin-AcevedoMedical Oncology, Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7067-173X
Bethany M WithycombeDepartment of Cutaneous Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL 33612, USA.
Youngchul KimDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL 33612, USA.
Andrew S BrohlDepartment of Cutaneous Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL 33612, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0071-0534
Zeynep ErogluDepartment of Cutaneous Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL 33612, USA.
Joseph MarkowitzDepartment of Cutaneous Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL 33612, USA.
Ahmad A TarhiniDepartment of Cutaneous Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL 33612, USA.
Kenneth Y TsaiDepartment of Pathology, Division of Dermatopathology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL 33612, USA.
Nikhil I KhushalaniDepartment of Cutaneous Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL 33612, USA.
Moffitt Cancer Center · USIndiana University Health · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anti-PD1 therapy demonstrated impressive, prolonged responses in advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC). Therapy for ICI-refractory/ineligible disease remains unclear. We performed a retrospective analysis in locally-advanced/metastatic CSCC using cetuximab across three cohorts: immediately after ICI failure (A), not immediately following ICI failure (B), or without prior ICI (C). The primary endpoint was the overall response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included disease-control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), time-to-response (TTR) and toxicity. Twenty-three patients were included. In cohort A (n = 11), the ORR was 64% and DCR was 91%, with six ongoing responses at data cutoff. In cohort B (n = 2), all patients had progression as the best response. At a median follow-up of 21 months for A and B, TTR and PFS were 2.0 and 17.3 months, respectively. The median OS was not reached. In cohort C (n = 10), the ORR and DCR were 80%, including five ongoing responses at the data cutoff. At a median follow-up of 22.4 months, the TTR, PFS and OS were 2.5, 7.3 and 23.1 months, respectively. Cetuximab was well tolerated in all cohorts. In summary, cetuximab is effective in patients with failure/contraindications to ICI. Cetuximab immediately after ICI failure yielded particularly fast, durable responses. If confirmed, this could be the preferred therapy following ICI failure.

Indexed as

cetuximabcutaneous squamous cell carcinomaimmune checkpoint inhibitorimmunodeficiencyimmunotherapytherapeutics

Identifiers

PMID37370790
PMCPMC10295991
OpenAlexW4380685721

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.