ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2023
Impact of Routinely Performed Optical Coherence Tomography Examinations on Quality of Life in Patients with Retinal Diseases-Results from the ALBATROS Data Collection.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Psychometric Assessment of the Metamorphopsia Questionnaire in Patients with Macular Diseases Receiving Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Treatment.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Review
- Remote Monitoring of Patients with Retinal Vein Occlusions Treated with Anti-VEGF: A Pilot Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- The Psychological, Social and Behavioral Impact of Intravitreal Anti-VEGF Therapy: An Analysis from the ALBATROS Data.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The use of OCT to monitor intravitreal treatment varies in clinical practice and is not always mandatory. The ALBATROS data collection aimed to clarify the impact of routinely implemented OCT on clinical outcomes and its impact on vision-related quality of life (VRQoL).
methodsAn observational cohort study included patients with retinal diseases starting an intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor treatment in Germany. Treatment followed clinical practice except mandatory OCT examination during the 12-month observation period. VRQoL was assessed by NEI VFQ-25 and compared with respect to OCT examinations and number of intravitreal injections in the different diseases (nAMD, DME, BRVO, CRVO).
results1478 patients (74.5 ± 10.9 years, 54.9% female) were included in the analysis. Patients had neovascular AMD (65.2%), DME (18.4%), BRVO (9.5%), or CRVO (6.9%). 8.8 ± 2.6 OCT examinations and 6.1 ± 3.2 intravitreal injections were performed within 12 months. VRQoL differed between indications at baseline, with substantially lower values for neovascular AMD and CRVO. After twelve months, an increase in visual acuity and visual functional scale was observed for nAMD, DME, and BRVO, while in DME only, there was an association between number of OCT examinations and VRQoL.
conclusionIntravitreal treatment was able to maintain VRQoL over twelve months in a real-world setting. Regular OCT examinations were associated with higher gain in VRQoL in DME patients after 12 months.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.