Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37376476›Full record

ReviewVaccines2023

A Meta-Analysis on the Association between Peptic Ulcer Disease and COVID-19 Severity.

Ying Wang, Jie Xu, Liqin Shi, Haiyan Yang, Yadong Wang

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Vaccines, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ying WangDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China.
Jie XuDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China.
Liqin ShiDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China.
Haiyan YangDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1797-304X
Yadong WangDepartment of Toxicology, Henan Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Zhengzhou 450016, China.

Funding

Henan Young and Middle-aged Health Science and Technology Innovation Talent Project YXKC2021005National Natural Science Foundation of China 82273696
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The association between peptic ulcer disease and the severity of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is inconclusive across individual studies. Thus, this study aimed to investigate whether there was a significant association between peptic ulcer disease and COVID-19 severity through a meta-analysis. The electronic databases (Web of Science, Wiley, Springer, EMBASE, Elsevier, Cochrane Library, Scopus and PubMed) were retrieved for all eligible studies. The Stata 11.2 software was used for all statistical analyses. The pooled odds ratio (OR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated by a random-effects meta-analysis model. The heterogeneity was evaluated by the inconsistency index (I

Indexed as

COVID-19meta-analysispeptic ulcer diseaseseverity

Identifiers

PMID37376476
PMCPMC10304706

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.