Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37376478›Full record

ReviewVaccines2023

Real-World Evidence in Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Enhanced Influenza Vaccines in Adults ≥ 65 Years of Age: Literature Review and Expert Opinion.

Maarten Postma, David Fisman, Norberto Giglio, Sergio Márquez-Peláez, Van Hung Nguyen, Andrea Pugliese, Jesús Ruiz-Aragón, Analia Urueña, Joaquin Mould-Quevedo

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Vaccines, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 7 institutions in 7 countries.

Maarten PostmaDepartment of Health Sciences, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, P.O. Box 72, 9700 AB Groningen, The Netherlands.
David FismanDalla Lana School of Public Health, Toronto, ON M5T 3M7, Canada.
Norberto GiglioHospital de Niños Ricardo Gutièrrez, Buenos Aires 1425, Argentina.ORCID 0000-0002-4388-8148
Sergio Márquez-PeláezDepartment of Economics, Economic Analysis, Faculty of Business Pablo de Olavide University, 41013 Seville, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-1911-748X
Van Hung NguyenVNH Consulting, Montreal, QC H2V 3L8, Canada.
Andrea PuglieseDepartment of Mathematics, University of Trento, 38123 Trento, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3512-8560
Jesús Ruiz-AragónHospital de la Línea de la Concepción, 11300 Cádiz, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-6530-5823
Analia UrueñaCentro de Estudios para la Prevención y Control de Enfermedades Transmisibles, Universidad Isalud, Buenos Aires C1095AAS, Argentina.ORCID 0000-0001-5108-2534
Joaquin Mould-QuevedoCSL Seqirus Inc., Summit, NJ 07901, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4847-5956
Hospital General de Niños Ricardo Gutierrez · ARPublic Health Ontario · CASeqirus (United States) · USUniversidad Isalud · ARUniversidad Pablo de Olavide · ESUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NLUniversity of Trento · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Influenza vaccination can benefit most populations, including adults ≥ 65 years of age, who are at greater risk of influenza-related complications. In many countries, enhanced vaccines, such as adjuvanted, high-dose, and recombinant trivalent/quadrivalent influenza vaccines (aTIV/aQIV, HD-TIV/HD-QIV, and QIVr, respectively), are recommended in older populations to provide higher immunogenicity and increased relative vaccine efficacy/effectiveness (rVE) than standard-dose vaccines. This review explores how efficacy and effectiveness data from randomized controlled trials and real-world evidence (RWE) are used in economic evaluations. Findings from published cost-effectiveness analyses (CEA) on enhanced influenza vaccines for older adults are summarized, and the assumptions and approaches used in these CEA are assessed alongside discussion of the importance of RWE in CEA. Results from many CEA showed that adjuvanted and high-dose enhanced vaccines were cost-effective compared with standard vaccines, and that differences in rVE estimates and acquisition price may drive differences in cost-effectiveness estimates between enhanced vaccines. Overall, RWE and CEA provide clinical and economic rationale for enhanced vaccine use in people ≥ 65 years of age, an at-risk population with substantial burden of disease. Countries that consider RWE when making vaccine recommendations have preferentially recommended aTIV/aQIV, as well as HD-TIV/HD-QIV and QIVr, to protect older individuals.

Indexed as

adjuvantedcost-effectiveness analysisenhanced vaccineinfluenza

Identifiers

PMID37376478
PMCPMC10302365
OpenAlexW4380354493

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.