Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37384110›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of preventive cardiology2023

Generalizability of REDUCE-IT eligibility criteria in a large diabetes cardiovascular outcomes trial: A post hoc subgroup analysis of EMPA-REG outcome: Analysis of EMPA-REG OUTCOME using REDUCE-IT criteria.

Subodh Verma, Andrew Kosmopoulos, Deepak L Bhatt, David Fitchett, Anne Pernille Ofstad, Christoph Wanner, Michaela Mattheus, Bernard Zinman, Patrick R Lawler, Lawrence A Leiter

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of preventive cardiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Global & regional health technology assessment
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 8 institutions in 4 countries.

Subodh VermaDivision of Cardiac Surgery, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute of St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Andrew KosmopoulosDivision of Cardiac Surgery, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute of St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Deepak L BhattMount Sinai Heart, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Health System, New York City, NY, United States.
David FitchettSt Michael's Hospital, Division of Cardiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Anne Pernille OfstadBoehringer Ingelheim Norway Ks, Asker, Norway.
Christoph WannerWürzburg University Clinic, Würzburg, Germany.
Michaela MattheusBoehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG, Ingelheim, Germany.
Bernard ZinmanLunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Patrick R LawlerPeter Munk Cardiac Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Lawrence A LeiterLi Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, ON, Canada.
St. Michael's Hospital · CABoehringer Ingelheim (Germany) · DEBoehringer Ingelheim (Norway) · NOMount Sinai Health System · USMount Sinai Hospital · CAUnity Health TorontoUniversity Health Network · CAUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: REDUCE-IT showed that icosapent ethyl (IPE) improved cardiovascular (CV) outcomes in participants with established CV disease (CVD) or type 2 diabetes (T2D) and at least one additional risk factor plus mild-moderate hypertriglyceridemia and reasonably controlled low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). As the generalizability of REDUCE-IT has not been investigated in a T2D population with established CVD, this Methods: Participants from EMPA-REG OUTCOME were screened for inclusion using both REDUCE-IT-like criteria (baseline statin therapy, triglycerides 135-499 mg/dL and LDL-C 41-100 mg/dL) and slightly amended FDA indication criteria (triglycerides ≥150 mg/dL). Analyses were conducted to characterize the study population and CV outcomes in participants eligible for IPE versus those not eligible for IPE. Results: Of the 7020 participants from EMPA-REG OUTCOME, 1810 (25.8%) fulfilled REDUCE-IT criteria and 3182 (45.3%) fulfilled FDA criteria for IPE treatment. Treatment effects of empagliflozin versus placebo on CV and kidney outcomes and mortality were consistent in participants meeting REDUCE-IT and FDA criteria and those who did not. Conclusions: These results indicate that a sizable proportion of patients with diabetes and established CVD, such as those in EMPA-REG OUTCOME, may be eligible for IPE treatment to lower residual CV risk. Treatment benefit with empagliflozin was consistent, regardless of REDUCE-IT or FDA eligibility criteria.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular diseaseIcosapent ethylOmega-3 fatty acidsTriglyceridesType 2 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID37384110
PMCPMC10293663
OpenAlexW4380202220

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.