ArticleBMJ open2023
Low-dose intravenous immunoglobulin for children with newly diagnosed immune thrombocytopenia: protocol of a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionIntravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) is a first-line treatment for children with newly diagnosed immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). However, the cost of IVIg is high. Higher doses of IVIg are associated with a more insupportable financial burden to paediatric patients' families and may produce more adverse reactions. Whether low-dose IVIg can quickly stop bleeding and induce a durable response in treating children with newly diagnosed ITP is not yet established. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will extensively search five English databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature) and three Chinese databases (CNKI, Wanfang and VIP). International Clinical Trials Registry Platform and ClinicalTrials.gov will also be searched as supplementary. Randomised controlled trials and prospective observational studies compared the efficacy of low-dose IVIg and high-dose or moderate-dose IVIg will be included. The primary outcome is the proportion of patients achieving durable response. Estimates of effect will be pooled with either a random-effect model or a fixed-effect model according to the heterogeneity of studies. If significant heterogeneity exists, we will conduct subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis to explore the source of heterogeneity and evaluate the robustness of the results. Publication bias will also be assessed, if possible. The risk of bias will be assessed using the Risk of Bias 2 and Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies of Interventions tools. The certainty of evidence will be evaluated using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) system. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: No ethical approval is required since this systematic review is based on previously published studies. The findings of this study will be presented at international conferences or published in a peer-reviewed journal. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42022384604.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.