Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37386248›Full record

ArticleNature genetics2023

Accurate rare variant phasing of whole-genome and whole-exome sequencing data in the UK Biobank.

Robin J Hofmeister, Diogo M Ribeiro, Simone Rubinacci, Olivier Delaneau

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature genetics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 173 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
173citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

173 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Big data and psychiatry: advances, constraints and future directions.World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Atlas of glomerular disease-specific genetic effects on blood transcriptome.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

113 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Robin J Hofmeister *Department of Computational Biology, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-9965-595X
Diogo M Ribeiro *Department of Computational Biology, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-0482-7342
Simone Rubinacci *Department of Computational Biology, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-7725-4813
Olivier DelaneauDepartment of Computational Biology, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland. olivier.delaneau@unil.ch.ORCID 0000-0002-3906-8446

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phasing involves distinguishing the two parentally inherited copies of each chromosome into haplotypes. Here, we introduce SHAPEIT5, a new phasing method that quickly and accurately processes large sequencing datasets and applied it to UK Biobank (UKB) whole-genome and whole-exome sequencing data. We demonstrate that SHAPEIT5 phases rare variants with low switch error rates of below 5% for variants present in just 1 sample out of 100,000. Furthermore, we outline a method for phasing singletons, which, although less precise, constitutes an important step towards future developments. We then demonstrate that the use of UKB as a reference panel improves the accuracy of genotype imputation, which is even more pronounced when phased with SHAPEIT5 compared with other methods. Finally, we screen the UKB data for loss-of-function compound heterozygous events and identify 549 genes where both gene copies are knocked out. These genes complement current knowledge of gene essentiality in the human genome.

Indexed as

Biological Specimen BanksGenome, HumanExome SequencingGenotypeHaplotypesHumansPolymorphism, Single NucleotideSequence Analysis, DNAUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID37386248
PMCPMC10335929

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.