ArticleAnnals of medicine2023
Is there a rationale for supplementing with vitamin D patients under treatment with allergen immunotherapy?
Article in Annals of medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Vitamin D (VD) has been shown to exert immunomodulatory activities, especially in promoting immune tolerance. For these properties VD has been proposed in the therapy of immunological conditions in which the loss of tolerance is the key pathogenetic aspect of the disease, such as allergies. Despite these properties available literature suggests VD is not useful in treating or preventing allergic diseases and whether low serum VD levels favor allergic sensitization and severity is debated. The level of VD is one of the many conditions that can influence allergic sensitization and therefore only a multivariate analysis on a numerically adequate cohort of patients, that considers all the factors that can favor allergy, would be able to assign the weight of each variable and determine the extent to which VD inhibits allergic sensitization and march. On the contrary, VD is able to potentiate the antigen-specific tolerogenic response induced by Allergen Immunotherapy (AIT) as demonstrated by the large majority of studies. In our experience, the association of VD and Sublingual AIT (LAIS, Lofarma, Italy) gave an excellent clinical and immune response in particular enhancing the differentiation of memory T regulatory cells. While waiting for a more extensive literature, VD/AIT combination should be always performed in treating allergies. In any case, the assessment of the level of VD should become a routine in allergic patients with an indication to AIT as, in case of VD deficiency or insufficiency, VD seems a particularly active adjuvant to the immune treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.