Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37388706›Full record

ArticleEngineering structures2023

Probabilistic detection of impacts using the PFEEL algorithm with a Gaussian Process Regression Model.

Yohanna MejiaCruz, Juan M Caicedo, Zhaoshuo Jiang, Jean M Franco

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Engineering structures, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Probabilistic Estimation of Cadence and Walking Speed From Floor Vibrations.IEEE journal of translational engineering in health and medicine · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yohanna MejiaCruzUniversity of South Carolina, Columbia SC, 29208, United States.
Juan M CaicedoUniversity of South Carolina, Columbia SC, 29208, United States.
Zhaoshuo JiangSan Francisco State University, 1600 Holloway Ave, San Francisco, CA 94132, United States.
Jean M FrancoUniversity of South Carolina, Columbia SC, 29208, United States.

Funding

SCH: INT: Inferring at home gait parameters of older adults using floor vibrations R01AG067395 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT COLUMBIA · PI CAICEDO, JUAN MARTIN, JIANG, ZHAOSHUO · 2019 to 2022
$1.2M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG067395
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Methods for identifying human activity have a wide range of potential applications, including security, event time detection, intelligent building environments, and human health. Current methodologies typically rely on either wave propagation or structural dynamics principles. However, force-based methods, such as the probabilistic force estimation and event localization algorithm (PFEEL), offer advantages over wave propagation methods by avoiding challenges such as multi-path fading. PFEEL utilizes a probabilistic framework to estimate the force of impacts and the event locations in the calibration space, providing a measure of uncertainty in the estimations. This paper presents a new implementation of PFEEL using a data-driven model based on Gaussian process regression (GPR). The new approach was evaluated using experimental data collected on an aluminum plate impacted at eighty-one points, with a separation of five centimeters. The results are presented as an area of localization relative to the actual impact location at different probability levels. These results can aid analysts in determining the required precision for various implementations of PFEEL.

Indexed as

event detectionGaussian process regressionGPRPFEEL algorithmprobabilistic event detectionstructural vibrations

Identifiers

PMID37388706
PMCPMC10300558

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.