Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37389204›Full record

ArticleFEMS microbes2023

Disruption of the skin, gill, and gut mucosae microbiome of gilthead seabream fingerlings after bacterial infection and antibiotic treatment.

Daniela Rosado, Paula Canada, Sofia Marques Silva, Nuno Ribeiro, Pedro Diniz, Raquel Xavier

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in FEMS microbes, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Daniela RosadoS2AQUA - Collaborative Laboratory, Association for a Sustainable and Smart Aquaculture, Avenida Parque Natural da Ria Formosa s/n, 8700-194 Olhão, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9312-3648
Paula CanadaCIIMAR - Interdisciplinary Center of Marine and Environmental Research, University of Porto, Terminal de Cruzeiros de Leixões. Av. General Norton de Matos, 4450-208 Matosinhos, Portugal.
Sofia Marques SilvaCIBIO, Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos, InBIO Laboratório Associado, Campus de Vairão, Universidade do Porto, R. Padre Armando Quintas 7, 4485-661 Vairão, Portugal.
Nuno RibeiroMVAQUA - Serviços Médico Veterinários dedicados a Aquacultura, Av. do Parque de Campismo Lote 24, Fração C, 3840-264 Gafanha da Boa Hora, Portugal.
Pedro DinizMarismar - Aquicultura Marinha, Lda, Rua do Cabrestante 28, 9000-105 Funchal, Portugal.
Raquel XavierCIBIO, Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos, InBIO Laboratório Associado, Campus de Vairão, Universidade do Porto, R. Padre Armando Quintas 7, 4485-661 Vairão, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8800-3924

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The activity of the microbiome of fish mucosae provides functions related to immune response, digestion, or metabolism. Several biotic and abiotic factors help maintaining microbial homeostasis, with disruptions leading to dysbiosis. Diseases and antibiotic administration are known to cause dysbiosis in farmed fish. Pathogen infections greatly affect the production of gilthead seabream, and antibiotic treatment is still frequently required. Here, we employed a 16S rRNA high-throughput metataxonomics approach to characterize changes in the gut, skin, and gill microbiomes occurring due to infection with

Indexed as

aquaculturedysbiosisfish infectionfish microbiomeoxytetracyclineSparus aurata

Identifiers

PMID37389204
PMCPMC10306326

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.