Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37389288›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in plant science2023

Exploring the crop epigenome: a comparison of DNA methylation profiling techniques.

Dolores Rita Agius, Aliki Kapazoglou, Evangelia Avramidou, Miroslav Baranek, Elena Carneros, Elena Caro, Stefano Castiglione, Angela Cicatelli, Aleksandra Radanovic, Jean-Paul Ebejer and 19 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in plant science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Epigenetic regulation and ROS signaling in plant stress adaptation: an integrated framework.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Grafting based DNA methylation alteration of snoRNAs in upland cotton (Physiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2024
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

29 authors.

Dolores Rita AgiusCentre of Molecular Medicine and Biobanking, University of Malta, Msida, Malta.
Aliki KapazoglouDepartment of Vitis, Institute of Olive Tree, Subtropical Crops and Viticulture (IOSV), Hellenic Agricultural Organization-DIMITRA (ELGO-DIMITRA), Athens, Greece.
Evangelia AvramidouLaboratory of Forest Genetics and Biotechnology, Institute of Mediterranean Forest Ecosystems, Hellenic Agricultural Organization-DIMITRA (ELGO-DIMITRA), Athens, Greece.
Miroslav BaranekMendeleum-Insitute of Genetics, Faculty of Horticulture, Mendel University in Brno, Lednice, Czechia.
Elena CarnerosCenter for Biological Research (CIB) of the Spanish National Research Council (CSIC), Madrid, Spain.
Elena CaroCentro de Biotecnología y Genómica de Plantas, Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria (INIA), Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (UPM), Madrid, Spain.
Stefano CastiglioneDepartment of Chemistry and Biology 'A. Zambelli', University of Salerno, Fisciano, Italy.
Angela CicatelliDepartment of Chemistry and Biology 'A. Zambelli', University of Salerno, Fisciano, Italy.
Aleksandra RadanovicInstitute of Field and Vegetable Crops, National Institute of Republic of Serbia, Novi Sad, Serbia.
Jean-Paul EbejerCentre of Molecular Medicine and Biobanking, University of Malta, Msida, Malta.
Daniel GackowskiDepartment of Clinical Biochemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Bydgoszcz, Poland.
Francesco GuarinoDepartment of Chemistry and Biology 'A. Zambelli', University of Salerno, Fisciano, Italy.
Andrea GulyásCentre for Agricultural Genomics and Biotechnology, Faculty of Agricultural and Food Sciences and Environmental Management, University of Debrecen, Nyíregyháza, Hungary.
Norbert HidvégiCentre for Agricultural Genomics and Biotechnology, Faculty of Agricultural and Food Sciences and Environmental Management, University of Debrecen, Nyíregyháza, Hungary.
Hans HoenickaGenomic Research Department, Thünen Institute of Forest Genetics, Grosshansdorf, Germany.
Vera InácioBioISI - BioSystems & Integrative Sciences Institute, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
Frank JohannesPlant Epigenomics, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Freising, Germany.
Erna KaralijaFaculty of Science, University of Sarajevo, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Michal Lieberman-LazarovichDepartment of Vegetables and Field Crops, Agricultural Research Organization, Volcani Center, Institute of Plant Sciences, Rishon LeZion, Israel.
Federico MartinelliDepartment of Biology, University of Florence, Sesto Fiorentino, Italy.
Stéphane MauryLaboratoire de Biologie des Ligneux et des Grandes Cultures EA1207 USC1328, INRAE, Université d'Orléans, Orléans, France.
Velimir MladenovFaculty of Agriculture, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia.
Leonor Morais-CecílioLinking Landscape, Environment, Agriculture and Food (LEAF), Institute of Agronomy, University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal.
Ales PecinkaCentre of Plant Structural and Functional Genomics, Institute of Experimental Botany of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Olomouc, Czechia.
Eleni TaniLaboratory of Plant Breeding and Biometry, Department of Crop Science, Agricultural University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Pilar S TestillanoCenter for Biological Research (CIB) of the Spanish National Research Council (CSIC), Madrid, Spain.
Dimitar TodorovDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Institute of Plant Physiology and Genetics, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Sofia, Bulgaria.
Luis ValledorPlant Physiology, Department of Organisms and Systems Biology and University Institute of Biotechnology of Asturias, University of Oviedo, Oviedo, Spain.
Valya VassilevaDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Institute of Plant Physiology and Genetics, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Sofia, Bulgaria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Epigenetic modifications play a vital role in the preservation of genome integrity and in the regulation of gene expression. DNA methylation, one of the key mechanisms of epigenetic control, impacts growth, development, stress response and adaptability of all organisms, including plants. The detection of DNA methylation marks is crucial for understanding the mechanisms underlying these processes and for developing strategies to improve productivity and stress resistance of crop plants. There are different methods for detecting plant DNA methylation, such as bisulfite sequencing, methylation-sensitive amplified polymorphism, genome-wide DNA methylation analysis, methylated DNA immunoprecipitation sequencing, reduced representation bisulfite sequencing, MS and immuno-based techniques. These profiling approaches vary in many aspects, including DNA input, resolution, genomic region coverage, and bioinformatics analysis. Selecting an appropriate methylation screening approach requires an understanding of all these techniques. This review provides an overview of DNA methylation profiling methods in crop plants, along with comparisons of the efficacy of these techniques between model and crop plants. The strengths and limitations of each methodological approach are outlined, and the importance of considering both technical and biological factors are highlighted. Additionally, methods for modulating DNA methylation in model and crop species are presented. Overall, this review will assist scientists in making informed decisions when selecting an appropriate DNA methylation profiling method.

Indexed as

bisulfite sequencingcrop epigenomeDNA methylation modulationDNA methylation profilingimmunological techniquesmass spectrometrynext-generation sequencing

Identifiers

PMID37389288
PMCPMC10306282

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.