ArticleEndocrine2023
Medical treatment of acromegaly-experience from the Croatian acromegaly registry.
Article in Endocrine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe aim of this study was to review therapeutic outcomes of the medical treatment of patients with acromegaly based on real-world data from the Croatian Acromegaly Registry.
methodsIn this retrospective study we investigated 163 patients (101 female, 62 male, age at diagnosis 47.2 ± 13.4 years) treated between 1990 and 2020, of which 53 were treated medically (32.5%). The duration of follow-up was 115.8 ± 304.4 months. The remission rate after the pituitary surgery was achieved in 66.5% (n = 105/158; 5 patients refused surgery). Patients who did not achieve disease remission or had a relapse during follow-up (n = 2), underwent reoperation (n = 18/60, 30%) and/or radiotherapy (n = 33/60, 55%) and/or medical treatment (n = 53/60, 88.3%). One patient refused further treatment after the failure of the first pituitary surgery.
resultsOut of 53 patients treated with medical therapy, monotherapy was used in 34 (64.2%) and combination therapy in 19 (35.8%) patients. Remission (IGF-I < 1.2 upper limit of normal, ULN) was achieved in 51 patients (96.2%). Out of 53 patients, 21 (39.6%) were treated with first-generation somatostatin receptor ligand (SRL-1) monotherapy, 10 (18.9%) with dopamine agonist (DA) monotherapy, one (1.9%) with pegvisomant monotherapy, 13 (24.4%) with a combination of SRL-1 and DA, three (5.7%) with a combination of SRL-1, DA and pegvisomant, two (3.8%) with a combination of second-generation somatostatin receptor ligand (SRL-2), DA and pegvisomant and in one (1.9%) temozolomide was added on top of SRL-1 and DA. Two patients currently have active disease, both on SRL-1 monotherapy, of whom one is non-adherent to the treatment. Radiotherapy was applied to 27 (50.9%) patients on medical therapy.
conclusionOur results indicate that almost all patients with active acromegaly after pituitary surgery can achieve biochemical control with medical treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.