Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37392328›Full record

SynthesisBreast cancer research and treatment2023

Discordance of PIK3CA mutational status between primary and metastatic breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Justus Rosin, Ella Svegrup, Antonios Valachis, Ioannis Zerdes

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Molecular tumor board in patients with metastatic breast cancer.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2025
    Article
  11. Precision diagnosis and treatment of PI3K/AKT/PTEN signaling pathway in HR-positive advanced breast cancer: perspectives from Chinese experts.Translational breast cancer research : a journal focusing on translational research in breast cancer · 2025
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Justus Rosin *School of Medical Sciences, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.
Ella Svegrup *School of Medical Sciences, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.
Antonios Valachis *Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University Hospital, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.
Ioannis Zerdes *Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. ioannis.zerdes@ki.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8304-2462

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIn light of the clinically meaningful results of the PI3K inhibitors in PIK3CA-mutated metastatic breast cancer (BC) patients, the reliable identification of PIK3CA mutations is of outmost importance. However, lack of evidence on the optimal site and timing of assessment, presence of temporal heterogeneity and analytical factors pose several challenges in clinical routine. We aimed to study the discordance rates of PIK3CA mutational status between primary and matched metastatic tumors.

methodsA systematic literature search was performed in three different databases (Embase, Pubmed, Web of Science) and-upon screening-a total of 25 studies reporting PIK3CA mutational status both on primary breast tumors and their matched metastases were included in this meta-analysis. The random-effects model was used for pooled analyses of discordance of PIK3CA mutational status.

resultsThe overall discordance rate of PIK3CA mutational status was 9.8% (95% CI, 7.0-13.0; n = 1425) and did not significantly differ within BC subtypes or metastatic sites. The change was bi-directional, more commonly observed from PIK3CA mutated to wild-type status (14.9%, 95% CI 11.8-18.2; n tumor pairs = 453) rather than the opposite direction (8.9%, 95% CI 6.1-12.1; n tumor pairs = 943).

conclusionsOur results indicate the need of obtaining metastatic biopsies for PIK3CA-mutation analysis and the possibility of testing of the primary tumor, in case a re-biopsy deemed non-feasible.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsClass I Phosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesFemaleHumansMutationPhosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesClass I Phosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesPhosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesPIK3CA protein, humanBreast cancerMetastasisMutationPIK3CAPrimary

Identifiers

PMID37392328
PMCPMC10361863

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.