Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37397004›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2023

Impact of cell-free supernatant of

Yanni Mao, Yuxia Wang, Xiaofeng Luo, Xiaohui Chen, Guiqin Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. DualFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  8. Microbial Oil Production byFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Potential of Fermented Food-DerivedInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Proteomic Analysis of the Differential Response ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yanni MaoVeterinary Pharmacology Lab, School of Animal Science and Technology, Ningxia University, Yinchuan, China.
Yuxia WangVeterinary Pharmacology Lab, School of Animal Science and Technology, Ningxia University, Yinchuan, China.
Xiaofeng LuoVeterinary Pharmacology Lab, School of Animal Science and Technology, Ningxia University, Yinchuan, China.
Xiaohui ChenVeterinary Pharmacology Lab, School of Animal Science and Technology, Ningxia University, Yinchuan, China.
Guiqin WangVeterinary Pharmacology Lab, School of Animal Science and Technology, Ningxia University, Yinchuan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: A safe bio-preservative agent, lactic acid bacteria (LAB) can inhibit the growth of pathogenic bacteria and spoilage organisms. Its cell-free supernatant (LAB-CFS), which is rich in bioactive compounds, is what makes LAB antibacterial work. Methods: This study focused on the changes in biofilm activity and related metabolic pathways of Results: The findings demonstrated that the LAB-CFS treatment considerably slowed Discussion: These findings show that LAB-CFS has a strong potential to combat

Indexed as

biofilmcell-free supernatantlactic acid bacteriametabolomic analysisStaphylococcus aureus

Identifiers

PMID37397004
PMCPMC10310794

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.