Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37397018›Full record

ReviewPeerJ2023

Electrochemical biosensors in healthcare services: bibliometric analysis and recent developments.

Ghazala Yunus, Rachana Singh, Sindhu Raveendran, Mohammed Kuddus

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in PeerJ, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ghazala YunusDepartment of Basic Science, University of Hail, Hail, Saudi Arabia.
Rachana SinghAmity Institute of Biotechnology, Amity University Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.ORCID 0000-0002-4485-752X
Sindhu RaveendranDepartment of Food Technology, TKM Institute of Technology, Kollam, Kerala, India.
Mohammed KuddusDepartment of Biochemistry, College of Medicine, University of Ha'il, Hail, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-5554-0598

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biosensors are nowadays being used in various fields including disease diagnosis and clinical analysis. The ability to detect biomolecules associated with disease is vital not only for accurate diagnosis of disease but also for drug discovery and development. Among the different types of biosensors, electrochemical biosensor is most widely used in clinical and health care services especially in multiplex assays due to its high susceptibility, low cost and small in size. This article includes comprehensive review of biosensors in medical field with special emphasis on electrochemical biosensors for multiplex assays and in healthcare services. Also, the publications on electrochemical biosensors are increasing rapidly; therefore, it is crucial to be aware of any latest developments or trends in this field of research. We used bibliometric analyses to summarize the progress of this research area. The study includes global publication counts on electrochemical biosensors for healthcare along with various bibliometric data analyses by VOSviewer software. The study also recognizes the top authors and journals in the related area, and determines proposal for monitoring research.

Indexed as

BibliometricsBiosensing TechniquesDelivery of Health CareBibliometric analysisBiosensorElectrochemical biosensorHealthcareMultiplex assaysVOSviewer

Identifiers

PMID37397018
PMCPMC10312160

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.