Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37398213›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2023

SCS: cell segmentation for high-resolution spatial transcriptomics.

Hao Chen, Dongshunyi Li, Ziv Bar-Joseph

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hao ChenComputational Biology Department, School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
Dongshunyi LiComputational Biology Department, School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
Ziv Bar-JosephComputational Biology Department, School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.

Funding

SenNet Supplement - Consortium BenchmarkingU24CA268108 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Philip D. Blood, JONATHAN C. SILVERSTEIN · 2021 to 2026
$22.1M
TriState SenNET (Lung and Heart) Tissue Map and Atlas consortiumU54AG075931 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI TOREN FINKEL, Melanie Koenigshoff · 2021 to 2026
$14.0M
Comprehensive, Flexible and FAIR Tools for the HuBMAP HIVEOT2OD026682 · OD · CARNEGIE-MELLON UNIVERSITY · PI PATEN, BENEDICT, RUFFALO, MATTHEW · 2018 to 2021
$3.4M
NCI NIH HHS U24 CA268108NIA NIH HHS U54 AG075931NIH HHS OT2 OD026682
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spatial transcriptomics promises to greatly improve our understanding of tissue organization and cell-cell interactions. While most current platforms for spatial transcriptomics only offer multi-cellular resolution, with 10-15 cells per spot, recent technologies provide a much denser spot placement leading to sub-cellular resolution. A key challenge for these newer methods is cell segmentation and the assignment of spots to cells. Traditional image-based segmentation methods are limited and do not make full use of the information profiled by spatial transcrip-tomics. Here we present SCS, which combines imaging data with sequencing data to improve cell segmentation accuracy. SCS assigns spots to cells by adaptively learning the position of each spot relative to the center of its cell using a transformer neural network. SCS was tested on two new sub-cellular spatial transcriptomics technologies and outperformed traditional image-based segmentation methods. SCS achieved better accuracy, identified more cells, and provided more realistic cell size estimation. Sub-cellular analysis of RNAs using SCS spots assignments provides information on RNA localization and further supports the segmentation results.

Identifiers

PMID37398213
PMCPMC10312435

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.