Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37403068›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2023

Comparing pedigree and genomic inbreeding coefficients, and inbreeding depression of reproductive traits in Japanese Black cattle.

Motohide Nishio, Keiichi Inoue, Shinichiro Ogawa, Kasumi Ichinoseki, Aisaku Arakawa, Yo Fukuzawa, Toshihiro Okamura, Eiji Kobayashi, Masaaki Taniguchi, Mika Oe and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Genomic Analysis of Inbreeding Depression on Productive Traits in Rubia Galega Beef Cattle Breed.Journal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Efficiency of Recurrent Genomic Selection in Panmictic Populations.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Detecting inbreeding depression in structured populations.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  18. Genomic Inbreeding and Runs of Homozygosity Analysis of Cashmere Goat.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Motohide NishioInstitute of Livestock and Grassland Science, NARO, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 3050901, Japan. mtnishio@affrc.go.jp.
Keiichi InoueUniversity of Miyazaki, Miyazaki, Miyazaki, 889-2192, Japan.
Shinichiro OgawaInstitute of Livestock and Grassland Science, NARO, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 3050901, Japan.
Kasumi IchinosekiNational Livestock Breeding Center, Nishigo, Fukushima, 961-8511, Japan.
Aisaku ArakawaInstitute of Livestock and Grassland Science, NARO, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 3050901, Japan.
Yo FukuzawaInstitute of Livestock and Grassland Science, NARO, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 3050901, Japan.
Toshihiro OkamuraInstitute of Livestock and Grassland Science, NARO, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 3050901, Japan.
Eiji KobayashiInstitute of Livestock and Grassland Science, NARO, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 3050901, Japan.
Masaaki TaniguchiInstitute of Livestock and Grassland Science, NARO, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 3050901, Japan.
Mika OeInstitute of Livestock and Grassland Science, NARO, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 3050901, Japan.
Kazuo IshiiInstitute of Livestock and Grassland Science, NARO, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 3050901, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPedigree-based inbreeding coefficients have been generally included in statistical models for genetic evaluation of Japanese Black cattle. The use of genomic data is expected to provide precise assessment of inbreeding level and depression. Recently, many measures have been used for genome-based inbreeding coefficients; however, with no consensus on which is the most appropriate. Therefore, we compared the pedigree- ([Formula: see text]) and multiple genome-based inbreeding coefficients, which were calculated from the genomic relationship matrix with observed allele frequencies ([Formula: see text]), correlation between uniting gametes ([Formula: see text]), the observed vs expected number of homozygous genotypes ([Formula: see text]), runs of homozygosity (ROH) segments ([Formula: see text]) and heterozygosity by descent segments ([Formula: see text]). We quantified inbreeding depression from estimating regression coefficients of inbreeding coefficients on three reproductive traits: age at first calving (AFC), calving difficulty (CD) and gestation length (GL) in Japanese Black cattle.

resultsThe highest correlations with [Formula: see text] were for [Formula: see text] (0.86) and [Formula: see text] (0.85) whereas [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] provided weak correlations with [Formula: see text], with range 0.33-0.55. Except for [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text], there were strong correlations among genome-based inbreeding coefficients ([Formula: see text] 0.94). The estimates of regression coefficients of inbreeding depression for [Formula: see text] was 2.1 for AFC, 0.63 for CD and -1.21 for GL, respectively, but [Formula: see text] had no significant effects on all traits. Genome-based inbreeding coefficients provided larger effects on all reproductive traits than [Formula: see text]. In particular, for CD, all estimated regression coefficients for genome-based inbreeding coefficients were significant, and for GL, that for [Formula: see text] had a significant.. Although there were no significant effects when using overall genome-level inbreeding coefficients for AFC and GL, [Formula: see text] provided significant effects at chromosomal level in four chromosomes for AFC, three chromosomes for CD, and two chromosomes for GL. In addition, similar results were obtained for [Formula: see text].

conclusionsGenome-based inbreeding coefficients can capture more phenotypic variation than [Formula: see text]. In particular, [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] can be considered good estimators for quantifying inbreeding level and identifying inbreeding depression at the chromosome level. These findings might improve the quantification of inbreeding and breeding programs using genome-based inbreeding coefficients.

Indexed as

InbreedingInbreeding DepressionAnimalsCattleGenomicsGenotypeHomozygotePedigreePolymorphism, Single NucleotideChromosomal inbreedingGenomic inbreedingInbreeding depressionPedigree inbreeding

Identifiers

PMID37403068
PMCPMC10321020

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.