Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37404828›Full record

Trial reportFrontiers in immunology2023

Safety and efficacy of dendritic cell vaccine for COVID-19 prevention after 1-Year follow-up: phase I and II clinical trial final result.

Jonny Jonny, Terawan Agus Putranto, Martina Lily Yana, Enda Cindylosa Sitepu, Raoulian Irfon, Bunga Pinandhita Ramadhani, Muchlis Achsan Udji Sofro, Yetty Movieta Nency, Endang Sri Lestari, Ria Triwardhani and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Frontiers in immunology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. A review of vaccinology andHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2025
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Jonny JonnyInstallation of Cellcure Development, Gatot Soebroto Central Army Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Terawan Agus PutrantoInstallation of Cellcure Development, Gatot Soebroto Central Army Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Martina Lily YanaInstallation of Cellcure Development, Gatot Soebroto Central Army Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Enda Cindylosa SitepuInstallation of Cellcure Development, Gatot Soebroto Central Army Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Raoulian IrfonInstallation of Cellcure Development, Gatot Soebroto Central Army Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Bunga Pinandhita RamadhaniInstallation of Cellcure Development, Gatot Soebroto Central Army Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Muchlis Achsan Udji SofroDr. Kariadi Hospital/Faculty of Medicine, Diponegoro University, Semarang, Indonesia.
Yetty Movieta NencyDr. Kariadi Hospital/Faculty of Medicine, Diponegoro University, Semarang, Indonesia.
Endang Sri LestariDr. Kariadi Hospital/Faculty of Medicine, Diponegoro University, Semarang, Indonesia.
Ria TriwardhaniDr. Kariadi Hospital/Faculty of Medicine, Diponegoro University, Semarang, Indonesia.
MujahidahDr. Kariadi Hospital/Faculty of Medicine, Diponegoro University, Semarang, Indonesia.
Retty Karisma SariDr. Kariadi Hospital/Faculty of Medicine, Diponegoro University, Semarang, Indonesia.
Nur Alaydrus SoetojoDr. Kariadi Hospital/Faculty of Medicine, Diponegoro University, Semarang, Indonesia.
Gatot Soebroto Army Hospital · IDDr. Kariadi Hospital · IDDiponegoro University · IDUniversitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta · ID

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Interim analysis of phase I and phase II clinical trials of personalized vaccines made from autologous monocyte-derived dendritic cells (DCs) incubated with S-protein of SARS-CoV-2 show that this vaccine is safe and well tolerated. Our previous report also indicates that this vaccine can induce specific T-cell and B cell responses against SARS-CoV-2. Herein, we report the final analysis after 1 year of follow-up regarding its safety and efficacy in subjects of phase I and phase II clinical trials. Methods: Adult subjects (>18 years old) were given autologous DCs derived from peripheral blood monocytes, which were incubated with the S-protein of SARS-CoV-2. The primary outcome is safety in phase I clinical trials. Meanwhile, optimal antigen dosage is determined in phase II clinical trials. Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) and Non-COVID-19 adverse events (AEs) were observed for 1 year. Results: A total of 28 subjects in the phase I clinical trial were randomly assigned to nine groups based on antigen and Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony Stimulating Factor (GM-CSF) dosage. In the phase II clinical trial, 145 subjects were randomly grouped into three groups based on antigen dosage. During the 1-year follow-up period, 35.71% of subjects in phase I and 16.54% in phase II had non-COVID AEs. No subjects in phase I experienced moderate-severe COVID-19. Meanwhile, 4.31% of subjects in phase II had moderate-severe COVID-19. There is no difference in both COVID and non-COVID-19 AEs between groups. Conclusions: After 1 year of follow-up, this vaccine is proven safe and effective for preventing COVID-19. A phase III clinical trial involving more subjects should be conducted to establish its efficacy and see other possible side effects.

Indexed as

Cancer VaccinesCOVID-19AdolescentAdultCOVID-19 VaccinesDendritic CellsHumansSARS-CoV-2Cancer VaccinesCOVID-19 Vaccinesautologous vaccinesclinical trialCOVID-19dendritic cellsSARS-CoV-2vaccine

Identifiers

PMID37404828
PMCPMC10315914
OpenAlexW4381165128

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.