ArticleJournal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)2023
Article in Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prospective comparison of ultra-high-resolution photon-counting detector CT coronary angiography versus conventional CT.The British journal of radiology · 2026Article
- Implications of coronary calcification on the assessment of plaque pathology: a comparison of computed tomography and multimodality intravascular imaging.European radiology · 2025Article
- Framework for evaluating photon-counting detectors under pile-up conditions.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2024Article
- Technical principles, benefits, challenges, and applications of photon counting computed tomography in coronary imaging: a narrative review.Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy · 2024Review
- Spectral Photon-Counting Computed Tomography: Technical Principles and Applications in the Assessment of Cardiovascular Diseases.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Comparison of Photon-counting Detector and Energy-integrating Detector CT for Visual Estimation of Coronary Percent Luminal Stenosis.Radiology · 2023Article
- Milestones in CT: Past, Present, and Future.Radiology · 2023Review
- Coronary artery stenosis quantification in patients with dense calcifications using ultra-high-resolution photon-counting-detector computed tomography.Journal of cardiovascular computed tomographyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: Coronary artery calcification (CAC) is an important indicator of coronary disease. Accurate volume quantification of CAC is challenging using computed tomography (CT) due to calcium blooming, which is a consequence of limited spatial resolution. Approach: CAC specimens ( Results: Compared with micro-CT, CT volume estimates had a mean absolute percent error of Conclusions: UHR clinical PCD-CT showed reduced calcium blooming artifacts and further enabled improved accuracy of CAC quantification beyond that of conventional EID-CT and previous generation PCD-CT systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.