ArticleChemical research in toxicology2023
Predicting the Mitochondrial Toxicity of Small Molecules: Insights from Mechanistic Assays and Cell Painting Data.
Article in Chemical research in toxicology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- A diffusion model conditioned on compound bioactivity profiles for generating high-content images.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Leveraging Consensus Docking Approaches for Human Mitochondrial Complexes I and III.Chemical research in toxicology · 2026Article
- Pipeline to evaluate YAP-TEAD inhibitors indicates TEAD inhibition repressesLife science alliance · 2025Article
- Mixture of experts for multitask learning in cardiotoxicity assessment.Journal of cheminformatics · 2025Article
- Predicting Liver-Related In Vitro Endpoints with Machine Learning to Support Early Detection of Drug-Induced Liver Injury.Chemical research in toxicology · 2025Article
- Cell Painting: a decade of discovery and innovation in cellular imaging.Nature methods · 2025Review
- Semisupervised Contrastive Learning for Bioactivity Prediction Using Cell Painting Image Data.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2025Article
- Computational Strategies for Assessing Adverse Outcome Pathways: Hepatic Steatosis as a Case Study.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Detection of a Mitochondrial Fragmentation and Integrated Stress Response Using the Cell Painting Assay.Journal of medicinal chemistry · 2024Article
- A Decade in a Systematic Review: The Evolution and Impact of Cell Painting.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mitochondrial toxicity is a significant concern in the drug discovery process, as compounds that disrupt the function of these organelles can lead to serious side effects, including liver injury and cardiotoxicity. Different in vitro assays exist to detect mitochondrial toxicity at varying mechanistic levels: disruption of the respiratory chain, disruption of the membrane potential, or general mitochondrial dysfunction. In parallel, whole cell imaging assays like Cell Painting provide a phenotypic overview of the cellular system upon treatment and enable the assessment of mitochondrial health from cell profiling features. In this study, we aim to establish machine learning models for the prediction of mitochondrial toxicity, making the best use of the available data. For this purpose, we first derived highly curated datasets of mitochondrial toxicity, including subsets for different mechanisms of action. Due to the limited amount of labeled data often associated with toxicological endpoints, we investigated the potential of using morphological features from a large Cell Painting screen to label additional compounds and enrich our dataset. Our results suggest that models incorporating morphological profiles perform better in predicting mitochondrial toxicity than those trained on chemical structures alone (up to +0.08 and +0.09 mean MCC in random and cluster cross-validation, respectively). Toxicity labels derived from Cell Painting images improved the predictions on an external test set up to +0.08 MCC. However, we also found that further research is needed to improve the reliability of Cell Painting image labeling. Overall, our study provides insights into the importance of considering different mechanisms of action when predicting a complex endpoint like mitochondrial disruption as well as into the challenges and opportunities of using Cell Painting data for toxicity prediction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.