Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37409906›Full record

Trial reportPsycho-oncology2023

Evaluation of the telehealth making sense of brain tumor psychological support intervention for people with primary brain tumor and their caregivers: A randomized controlled trial.

Tamara Ownsworth, Suzanne Chambers, Stephanie Jones, Giverny Parker, Joanne F Aitken, Matthew Foote, Louisa G Gordon, David H K Shum, Julia Robertson, Elizabeth Conlon and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialPragmatic Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Psycho-oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The impact of financial toxicity on quality of life for survivors of primary brain tumour.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2025
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Tamara OwnsworthSchool of Applied Psychology, Griffith University, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1835-7094
Suzanne ChambersFaculty of Health Sciences, Australian Catholic University, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2369-6111
Stephanie JonesSchool of Applied Psychology, Griffith University, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Giverny ParkerSchool of Applied Psychology, Griffith University, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Joanne F AitkenCancer Council Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Matthew FooteDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Louisa G GordonQIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3159-4249
David H K ShumDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China.
Julia RobertsonSummer Foundation Ltd, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8122-8378
Elizabeth ConlonSchool of Applied Psychology, Griffith University, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Mark B PinkhamDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Griffith University · AUThe University of Queensland · AUAustralian Catholic University · AUCancer Council Queensland · AUHong Kong Polytechnic University · HKMyer Foundation · AUQIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis pragmatic randomized control trial aimed to evaluate clinical efficacy of the Making Sense of Brain Tumour program delivered via videoconferencing (Tele-MAST) for improving mental health and quality of life (QoL) relative to standard care in individuals with primary brain tumor (PBT).

methodAdults with PBT experiencing at least mild distress (Distress Thermometer ≥4) and caregivers were randomly allocated to the 10-session Tele-MAST program or standard care. Mental health and QoL were assessed pre-intervention, post-intervention (primary endpoint), and 6-weeks and 6-months follow-up. The primary outcome was clinician-rated depressive symptoms on the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale.

results82 participants with PBT (34% benign, 20% lower-grade glioma, 46% high-grade glioma) and 36 caregivers were recruited (2018-2021). Controlling for baseline functioning, Tele-MAST participants with PBT had lower depressive symptoms at post-intervention (95% CI: 10.2-14.6, vs. 15.2-19.6, p = 0.002) and 6-weeks post-intervention (95% CI: 11.5-15.8 vs. 15.6-19.9, p = 0.010) than standard care, and were almost 4 times more likely to experience clinically reduced depression (OR, 3.89; 95% CI: 1.5-9.9). Tele-MAST participants with PBT also reported significantly better global QoL, emotional QoL and lower anxiety at post-intervention and 6-weeks post-intervention than standard care. There were no significant intervention effects for caregivers. At 6-months follow-up participants with PBT who received Tele-MAST reported significantly better mental health and QoL relative to pre-intervention.

conclusionsTele-MAST was found to be more effective for reducing depressive symptoms at post-intervention than standard care for people with PBT but not caregivers. Tailored and extended psychological support may be beneficial for people with PBT.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsGliomaTelemedicineAdultCaregiversDepressionHumansQuality of Lifecaregiversinterventionprimary brain tumorpsychological supportrandomized controlled trialtelehealth

Identifiers

PMID37409906
PMCPMC10946492
OpenAlexW4383302938

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.