ArticleAdvances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.)2023
Perspective: A Conceptual Framework for Adaptive Personalized Nutrition Advice Systems (APNASs).
Article in Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Proteomic profiling in personalized nutrition: a systematic review and methodological frameworks of randomized controlled trials.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Pooled it
- The Future for Personalised Nutrition.Nutrition bulletin · 2026Article
- Personalization of Training and Weight Reduction Using Artificial Intelligence: A Scoping Review of Current Evidence and Practical Limitations.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2026Review
- Differential associations of dietary patterns with estimated 10-year cardiovascular risk in diabetes subtypes.Scientific reports · 2026Observational
- Precision nutrition must consider cost-effectiveness to deliver benefits to patients.Nature medicine · 2026Article
- Personalized nutrition for healthy aging: precision diets based on genomic, metabolic, and microbiome profiles.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Review
- Advancing personalised and precision nutrition.Journal of nutritional science · 2026Review
- Data in Personalized Nutrition: Bridging Biomedical, Psycho-behavioral, and Food Environment Approaches for Population-wide Impact.Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.) · 2025Review
- Personalising dietary advice for disease prevention: concepts and experiences.Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology · 2025Review
- Perspective on the ethics of AI at the intersection of nutrition and behaviour change.Frontiers in aging · 2025Article
- Dietary assessment and dietary guidelines across 11 European Union countries: a review from the PLAN'EAT project.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Review
- The future backbone of nutritional science: integrating public health priorities with system-oriented precision nutrition.The British journal of nutrition · 2024Review
- Machine learning and personalized nutrition: a promising liaison?European journal of clinical nutrition · 2024Article
- Attitudes towards personalised nutrition recommendations in health apps: Results of a cross-sectional online survey.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nearly all approaches to personalized nutrition (PN) use information such as the gene variants of individuals to deliver advice that is more beneficial than a generic "1-size-fits-all" recommendation. Despite great enthusiasm and the increased availability of commercial services, thus far, scientific studies have only revealed small to negligible effects on the efficacy and effectiveness of personalized dietary recommendations, even when using genetic or other individual information. In addition, from a public health perspective, scholars are critical of PN because it primarily targets socially privileged groups rather than the general population, thereby potentially widening health inequality. Therefore, in this perspective, we propose to extend current PN approaches by creating adaptive personalized nutrition advice systems (APNASs) that are tailored to the type and timing of personalized advice for individual needs, capacities, and receptivity in real-life food environments. These systems encompass a broadening of current PN goals (i.e., what should be achieved) to incorporate "individual goal preferences" beyond currently advocated biomedical targets (e.g., making sustainable food choices). Moreover, they cover the "personalization processes of behavior change" by providing in situ, "just-in-time" information in real-life environments (how and when to change), which accounts for individual capacities and constraints (e.g., economic resources). Finally, they are concerned with a "participatory dialog between individuals and experts" (e.g., actual or virtual dieticians, nutritionists, and advisors) when setting goals and deriving measures of adaption. Within this framework, emerging digital nutrition ecosystems enable continuous, real-time monitoring, advice, and support in food environments from exposure to consumption. We present this vision of a novel PN framework along with scenarios and arguments that describe its potential to efficiently address individual and population needs and target groups that would benefit most from its implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.