Evidence mapPaperPMID 37420186Full record

Trial reportReproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E2023

Clinical pregnancy rate for frozen embryo transfer with HRT: a randomized controlled pilot study comparing 1 week versus 2 weeks of oestradiol priming.

Annalisa Racca, Samuel Santos-Ribeiro, Panagiotis Drakopoulos, Joran De Coppel, Lisbet Van Landuyt, Herman Tournaye, Christophe Blockeel

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03930706 (Clinical Pregnancy Rate for Frozen Embryo Transfer With Hormonal Replacement Therapy), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03930706 nacompletednot on this map

Clinical Pregnancy Rate for Frozen Embryo Transfer With Hormonal Replacement Therapy (HRT): a Pilot Study Comparing 1 Versus 2 Weeks of Treatment

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversitair Ziekenhuis BrusselRan2018 to 2021Enrolled150ConditionsInfertilityArmsLonger administration of estradiol (Progynova®)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 5 countries.

Annalisa RaccaReproductive Medicine Service, Dexeus University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain. annalisaracca@icloud.com.
Samuel Santos-RibeiroIVI-RMA Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal.
Panagiotis DrakopoulosCentre for Reproductive Medicine, Brussels IVF, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Joran De CoppelCentre for Reproductive Medicine, Brussels IVF, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Lisbet Van LanduytCentre for Reproductive Medicine, Brussels IVF, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Herman TournayeCentre for Reproductive Medicine, Brussels IVF, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Christophe BlockeelCentre for Reproductive Medicine, Brussels IVF, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel · BEHospital Universitario Dexeus · ESSechenov University · RUUniversity of Lisbon · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

research questionDoes a frozen-embryo transfer in an artificially-prepared endometrium (FET-HRT) cycle yield similar clinical pregnancy rate with 7 days of oestrogen priming compared to 14 days?

designThis is a single-centre, randomized, controlled, open-label pilot study. All FET-HRT cycles were performed in a tertiary centre between October 2018 and January 2021. Overall, 160 patients were randomized, with a 1:1 allocation, into two groups of 80 patients each: group A (7 days of E2 prior to P4 supplementation) and group B (14 days of E2 prior to P4 supplementation). Both groups received single blastocyst stage embryos on the 6th day of vaginal P4 administration. The primary outcome was the feasibility of such strategy assessed as clinical pregnancy rate, secondary outcomes were biochemical pregnancy rate, miscarriage rate, live birth rate and serum hormone levels on the day of FET. Chemical pregnancy was assessed by an hCG blood test 12 days after FET and clinical pregnancy was confirmed by transvaginal ultrasound at 7 weeks.

resultsThe analysis included 160 patients who were randomly assigned to either group A or group B on the seventh day of their FET-HRT cycle if the measured endometrial thickness was above 6.5 mm. Following screening failures and of drop-outs, 144 patients were finally included both in group A (75 patients) or group B (69 patients). Demographic characteristics for both groups were comparable. The biochemical pregnancy rate was 42.5% and 48.8% for group A and group B, respectively (p 0.526). Regarding the clinical pregnancy rate at 7 weeks, no statistical difference was observed (36.3% vs 46.3% for group A and group B, respectively, p = 0.261). The secondary outcomes of the study (biochemical pregnancy, miscarriage, and live birth rate) were comparable between the two groups for IIT analysis, as well as the P4 values on the day of FET.

conclusionsIn a frozen embryo transfer cycle, performed with artificial preparation of the endometrium, 7 versus 14 days of oestrogen priming are comparable, in terms of clinical pregnancy rate; the advantages of a seven-day protocol include the shorter time to pregnancy, reduced exposure to oestrogens, and more flexibility of scheduling and programming, and less probability to recruit a follicle and have a spontaneous LH surge. It is important to keep in mind that this study was designed as a pilot trial with a limited study population as such it was underpowered to determine the superiority of an intervention over another; larger-scale RCTs are warranted to confirm our preliminary results.

trial registrationClinical trial number: NCT03930706.

Indexed as

Abortion, SpontaneousEstradiolEmbryo TransferEstrogensFemaleHumansPilot ProjectsPregnancyPregnancy RateRetrospective StudiesEstradiolEstrogens

Identifiers

PMID37420186
PMCPMC10326948
OpenAlexW4383553844

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.