Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37420705›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Comparison of Training Strategies for Autoencoder-Based Monochromatic Image Denoising.

Piotr Jóźwik-Wabik, Krzysztof Bernacki, Adam Popowicz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Piotr Jóźwik-WabikFaculty of Automatic Control, Electronics and Computer Science, Silesian University of Technology, Akademicka 16, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-4410-2837
Krzysztof BernackiFaculty of Automatic Control, Electronics and Computer Science, Silesian University of Technology, Akademicka 16, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-4647-7114
Adam PopowiczFaculty of Automatic Control, Electronics and Computer Science, Silesian University of Technology, Akademicka 16, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-3184-5228

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Monochromatic images are used mainly in cases where the intensity of the received signal is examined. The identification of the observed objects as well as the estimation of intensity emitted by them depends largely on the precision of light measurement in image pixels. Unfortunately, this type of imaging is often affected by noise, which significantly degrades the quality of the results. In order to reduce it, numerous deterministic algorithms are used, with Non-Local-Means and Block-Matching-3D being the most widespread and treated as the reference point of the current state-of-the-art. Our article focuses on the utilization of machine learning (ML) for the denoising of monochromatic images in multiple data availability scenarios, including those with no access to noise-free data. For this purpose, a simple autoencoder architecture was chosen and checked for various training approaches on two large and widely used image datasets: MNIST and CIFAR-10. The results show that the method of training as well as architecture and the similarity of images within the image dataset significantly affect the ML-based denoising. However, even without access to any clear data, the performance of such algorithms is frequently well above the current state-of-the-art; therefore, they should be considered for monochromatic image denoising.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsDiagnostic ImagingImage Processing, Computer-AssistedSignal-To-Noise RatioautoencoderGaussian noiseimage denoising

Identifiers

PMID37420705
PMCPMC10305082

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.