Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37425564›Full record

ReviewCureus2023

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors as a Treatment Option for Bladder Cancer: Current Evidence.

Tobechukwu J Okobi, Trinitas Oserefuamen Uhomoibhi, Darlington E Akahara, Victor A Odoma, Ibilola A Sanusi, Okelue E Okobi, Ifiok Umana, Emeka Okobi, Chinwe C Okonkwo, Nkechinyere M Harry

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
8.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The role of exosomes in bladder cancer immunotherapy.Journal of the National Cancer Center · 2025
    Review
  6. Salivary biomarkers: a promising approach for predicting immunotherapy response in head and neck cancers.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2025
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 10 institutions in 5 countries.

Tobechukwu J OkobiInternal Medicine, Bronx Care Health System, New York, USA.
Trinitas Oserefuamen UhomoibhiInternal Medicine, Georgetown University, Washington, D.C., USA.
Darlington E AkaharaMedicine, Windsor University School of Medicine, Cayon, KNA.
Victor A OdomaCardiology/Oncology, IU Health, Bloomington, USA.
Ibilola A SanusiInternal Medicine, University of Texas at Houston, Houston, USA.
Okelue E OkobiFamily Medicine, Medficient Health Systems, Laurel, USA.
Ifiok UmanaUrology, Jos University Teaching Hospital, Jos, NGA.
Emeka OkobiDentistry, Ahmadu Bello University Teaching Hospital Zaria, Abuja, NGA.
Chinwe C OkonkwoFamily Medicine, Caribbean Medical University School of Medicine, Willemstad, CUW.
Nkechinyere M HarryInternal Medicine, National Pirogov Memorial University, Vinnitsa, UKR.
Ahmadu Bello University Teaching Hospital · NGCaribbean Research and Management of Biodiversity Foundation · CWGeorgetown University · USJos University Teaching Hospital · NGMontefiore Health System · USNational Pirogov Memorial Medical University, Vinnytsya · UANorthwestern Health Sciences University · USUniversity of Houston · USVirtua Health · USWindsor University School of Medicine · KN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bladder cancer is a prevalent disease, and treatment options for advanced bladder cancer remain limited. However, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) targeting cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 (CTLA-4) and programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) have shown promise in treating bladder cancer. These drugs work by blocking receptors and ligands, disrupting signaling, and allowing T cells to recognize and attack cancer cells. ICIs have been found to be effective in treating bladder cancer, especially in cases of metastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC) that have progressed after chemotherapy. Furthermore, combination therapy with ICIs and chemotherapy or radiation therapy has shown promise in treating bladder cancer. While there are challenges associated with ICIs, including adverse effects, immune-related adverse events, and lack of efficacy in some patients, they remain a promising option for bladder cancer treatment, especially in cases where other treatment options have failed. This review paper focuses on the current role, challenges, and future trends of immunotherapy in the management of bladder cancer.

Indexed as

biomarkersbladder cancerimmune check point inhibitorsimmunotherapytreatment

Identifiers

PMID37425564
PMCPMC10323982
OpenAlexW4379535548

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.