Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37425899›Full record

ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2023

Fidelity and adherence to a liquefied petroleum gas stove and fuel intervention: the multi-country Household Air Pollution Intervention Network (HAPIN) trial.

Kendra N Williams, Ashlinn Quinn, Hayley North, Jiantong Wang, Ajay Pillarisetti, Lisa M Thompson, Anaité Díaz-Artiga, Kalpana Balakrishnan, Gurusamy Thangavel, Ghislaine Rosa and 11 more

Abstract readPreprint
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Kendra N WilliamsDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Ashlinn QuinnBerkeley Air Monitoring Group, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Hayley NorthFogarty International Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Jiantong WangDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Ajay PillarisettiDivision of Environmental Health Sciences, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Lisa M ThompsonNell Hodgson Woodruff School of Nursing, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Anaité Díaz-ArtigaCenter for Health Studies, Universidad del Valle de Guatemala, Guatemala City, Guatemala.
Kalpana BalakrishnanICMR Center for Advanced Research on Air Quality, Climate and Health, Department of Environmental Health Engineering, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research, Chennai, India.
Gurusamy ThangavelICMR Center for Advanced Research on Air Quality, Climate and Health, Department of Environmental Health Engineering, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research, Chennai, India.
Ghislaine RosaPublic Health, Policy & Systems, Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Florien NdagijimanaEagle Research Center Limited, Kigali, Rwanda.
Lindsay J UnderhillCardiovascular Division, John T. Milliken Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, MO, USA.
Miles A KirbyDepartment of Global Health and Population, Harvard University T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Elisa PuzzoloPublic Health, Policy & Systems, Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Shakir HossenDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Lance A WallerDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Jennifer L PeelDepartment of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA.
Joshua P RosenthalFogarty International Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Thomas F ClasenGangarosa Department of Environmental Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Steven A HarveyDepartment of International Health, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
William CheckleyDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Funding

Household Air Pollution and Health: A Multi-Country LPG Intervention TrialUM1HL134590 · NHLBI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI CHECKLEY, WILLIAM, CLASEN, THOMAS F · 2016 to 2021
$31.1M
NCIPC CDC HHS R01 CE002981NHLBI NIH HHS UM1 HL134590
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Reducing household air pollution (HAP) to levels associated with health benefits requires nearly exclusive use of clean cooking fuels and abandonment of traditional biomass fuels. Methods: The Household Air Pollution Intervention Network (HAPIN) trial randomized 3,195 pregnant women in Guatemala, India, Peru, and Rwanda to receive a liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) stove intervention (n=1,590), with controls expected to continue cooking with biomass fuels (n=1,605). We assessed fidelity to intervention implementation and participant adherence to the intervention starting in pregnancy through the infant's first birthday using fuel delivery and repair records, surveys, observations, and temperature-logging stove use monitors (SUMs). Results: Fidelity and adherence to the HAPIN intervention were high. Median time required to refill LPG cylinders was 1 day (interquartile range 0-2). Although 26% (n=410) of intervention participants reported running out of LPG at some point, the number of times was low (median: 1 day [Q1, Q3: 1, 2]) and mostly limited to the first four months of the COVID-19 pandemic. Most repairs were completed on the same day as problems were reported. Traditional stove use was observed in only 3% of observation visits, and 89% of these observations were followed up with behavioral reinforcement. According to SUMs data, intervention households used their traditional stove a median of 0.4% of all monitored days, and 81% used the traditional stove <1 day per month. Traditional stove use was slightly higher post-COVID-19 (detected on a median [Q1, Q3] of 0.0% [0.0%, 3.4%] of days) than pre-COVID-19 (0.0% [0.0%, 1.6%] of days). There was no significant difference in intervention adherence pre- and post-birth. Conclusion: Free stoves and an unlimited supply of LPG fuel delivered to participating homes combined with timely repairs, behavioral messaging, and comprehensive stove use monitoring contributed to high intervention fidelity and near-exclusive LPG use within the HAPIN trial.

Indexed as

adherenceclean cookinghealth behavior changehousehold air pollutionintervention fidelityliquefied petroleum gas

Identifiers

PMID37425899
PMCPMC10327189

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.