ArticleNucleic acids research2023
Predicting functional consequences of SNPs on mRNA translation via machine learning.
Article in Nucleic acids research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cytokine Gene Variants as Predisposing Factors for the Development and Progression of Coronary Artery Disease: A Systematic Review.Biomolecules · 2024Pooled it
- Allele-resolved monosome and polysome sequencing identifies cis-variants affecting mRNA translation.Life science alliance · 2026Article
- Natural genetic variation in calcium sensor genes as a novel resource for abiotic stress tolerance in crops.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Review
- Genome and transcriptomic analysis of the adaptation ofComputational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024Review
- Integrated multiplexed assays of variant effect reveal determinants of catechol-O-methyltransferase gene expression.Molecular systems biology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The functional impact of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) on translation has yet to be considered when prioritizing disease-causing SNPs from genome-wide association studies (GWAS). Here we apply machine learning models to genome-wide ribosome profiling data to predict SNP function by forecasting ribosome collisions during mRNA translation. SNPs causing remarkable ribosome occupancy changes are named RibOc-SNPs (Ribosome-Occupancy-SNPs). We found that disease-related SNPs tend to cause notable changes in ribosome occupancy, suggesting translational regulation as an essential pathogenesis step. Nucleotide conversions, such as 'G → T', 'T → G' and 'C → A', are enriched in RibOc-SNPs, with the most significant impact on ribosome occupancy, while 'A → G' (or 'A→ I' RNA editing) and 'G → A' are less deterministic. Among amino acid conversions, 'Glu → stop (codon)' shows the most significant enrichment in RibOc-SNPs. Interestingly, there is selection pressure on stop codons with a lower collision likelihood. RibOc-SNPs are enriched at the 5'-coding sequence regions, implying hot spots of translation initiation regulation. Strikingly, ∼22.1% of the RibOc-SNPs lead to opposite changes in ribosome occupancy on alternative transcript isoforms, suggesting that SNPs can amplify the differences between splicing isoforms by oppositely regulating their translation efficiency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.