Evidence mapPaperPMID 37428504Full record

Trial reportJAMA network open2023

Effectiveness of Bundled Hyperpolypharmacy Deprescribing Compared With Usual Care Among Older Adults: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Lisa J Herrinton, Keras Lo, Mubarika Alavi, Stacey E Alexeeff, Kerri M Butler, Carter Chang, Christopher C Chang, Virginia L Chu, Ashok Krishnaswami, Lynn H Deguzman and 3 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA network open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05616689 (Bundled Hyperpolypharmacy Deprescribing), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05616689 nacompletednot on this map

Bundled Hyperpolypharmacy Deprescribing: Implementation and Evaluation of a System-wide Quality Improvement Intervention

TypeinterventionalSponsorKaiser PermanenteRan2020 to 2023Enrolled2,471ConditionsPolypharmacyArmsBundled hyperpolypharmacy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lisa J HerrintonDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland.
Keras LoPharmacy Operations, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland.
Mubarika AlaviDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland.
Stacey E AlexeeffDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland.
Kerri M ButlerPharmacy Operations, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland.
Carter ChangAdult and Family Medicine, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland.
Christopher C ChangPharmacy Operations, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland.
Virginia L ChuPharmacy Operations, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland.
Ashok KrishnaswamiDepartment of Cardiology, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, San Jose.
Lynn H DeguzmanPharmacy Operations, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland.
Stephanie PrausnitzDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland.
Michael D MasonGeriatrics and Continuing Care, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland.
Maisha DravesAdult and Family Medicine, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland.
Kaiser Permanente · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Older patients using many prescription drugs (hyperpolypharmacy) may be at increased risk of adverse drug effects. Objective: To test the effectiveness and safety of a quality intervention intended to reduce hyperpolypharmacy. Design, Setting, and Participants: This randomized clinical trial allocated patients 76 years or older who used 10 or more prescription medications to a deprescribing intervention or to usual care (1:1 ratio) at an integrated health system with multiple preexisting deprescribing workflows. Data were collected from October 15, 2020, to July 29, 2022. Intervention: Physician-pharmacist collaborative drug therapy management, standard-of-care practice recommendations, shared decision-making, and deprescribing protocols administered by telephone over multiple cycles for a maximum of 180 days after allocation. Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary end points were change in the number of medications and in the prevalence of geriatric syndrome (falls, cognition, urinary incontinence, and pain) from 181 to 365 days after allocation compared with before randomization. Secondary outcomes were use of medical services and adverse drug withdrawal effects. Results: Of a random sample of 2860 patients selected for potential enrollment, 2470 (86.4%) remained eligible after physician authorization, with 1237 randomized to the intervention and 1233 to usual care. A total of 1062 intervention patients (85.9%) were reached and agreed to enroll. Demographic variables were balanced. The median age of the 2470 patients was 80 (range, 76-104) years, and 1273 (51.5%) were women. In terms of race and ethnicity, 185 patients (7.5%) were African American, 234 (9.5%) were Asian or Pacific Islander, 220 (8.9%) were Hispanic, 1574 (63.7%) were White (63.7%), and 257 (10.4%) were of other (including American Indian or Alaska Native, Native Hawaiian, or >1 race or ethnicity) or unknown race or ethnicity. During follow-up, both the intervention and usual care groups had slight reductions in the number of medications dispensed (mean changes, -0.4 [95% CI, -0.6 to -0.2] and -0.4 [95% CI, -0.6 to -0.3], respectively), with no difference between the groups (P = .71). There were no significant changes in the prevalence of a geriatric condition in the usual care and intervention groups at the end of follow-up and no difference between the groups (baseline prevalence: 47.7% [95% CI, 44.9%-50.5%] vs 42.9% [95% CI, 40.1%-45.7%], respectively; difference-in-differences, 1.0 [95% CI, -3.5 to 5.6]; P = .65). No differences in use of medical services or adverse drug withdrawal effects were observed. Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial from an integrated care setting with various preexisting deprescribing workflows, a bundled hyperpolypharmacy deprescribing intervention was not associated with reduction in medication dispensing, prevalence of geriatric syndrome, utilization of medical services, or adverse drug withdrawal effects. Additional research is needed in less integrated settings and in more targeted populations. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05616689.

Indexed as

DeprescriptionsAgedAged, 80 and overAlaskaFemaleHawaiiHumansMaleMedication Therapy Management

Identifiers

PMID37428504
PMCPMC10334220
OpenAlexW4383710879

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.