Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37430146›Full record

ArticleNeurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics2023

Long-Term Effect of Switching From an Anti-CGRP Receptor to an Anti-CGRP Ligand Antibody in Treatment-Refractory Chronic Migraine: A Prospective Real-World Analysis.

Giorgio Lambru, Valeria Caponnetto, Bethany Hill, Susanna Ratti, Simona Sacco, Madeleine Murphy, Jessica Briscoe, Anna P Andreou

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Giorgio LambruThe Headache and Facial Pain Service, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK. giorgio.lambru@gstt.nhs.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-2780-4776
Valeria CaponnettoThe Headache and Facial Pain Service, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Bethany HillThe Headache and Facial Pain Service, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Susanna RattiDepartment of Applied Clinical Sciences and Biotechnology, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.
Simona SaccoDepartment of Applied Clinical Sciences and Biotechnology, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.
Madeleine MurphyThe Headache and Facial Pain Service, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Jessica BriscoeThe Headache and Facial Pain Service, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Anna P AndreouThe Headache and Facial Pain Service, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust · GBKing's College London · GBUniversity of L'Aquila · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In migraine patients with a poor response to a calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibody against the receptor, switching to a calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies against the ligand may be beneficial. This was a long-term real-world prospective analysis conducted in treatment-refractory chronic migraine patients coming from two large tertiary referral headache centres, who did not achieve a meaningful response to erenumab and were switched to fremanezumab. Responders to fremanezumab were considered those who achieved at least 30% reduction in monthly migraine days by month 3, compared to the post-erenumab baseline. Secondary efficacy and disability outcomes were analysed. Thirty-nine patients (female n = 32, 82.1%; median age: 49 years old, IQR = 29.0-56.0) were included. After three months of treatment with fremanezumab, ten out of 39 patients (25.6%) were considered responders. Four of the 11 patients who continued fremanezumab became responders at month 6, increasing the number of responders to 14 patients (35.9%). Responders received a median of 12 injections (IQR = 9.0-18.0) at the time of the analysis. After the last treatment, 13 patients (33.3%) remained responders. The number of mean monthly migraine days significantly decreased from 21.4 at baseline (IQR = 10.7-30.0) to 8.6 (IQR = 3.8-13.9) at the last follow-up. Painkillers intake and HIT-6 score were significantly reduced at the last follow-up. About 1/3 of patients with treatment refractory chronic migraine who have a disappointing response to erenumab and switch to fremanezumab, obtained a meaningful and sustained improvement of their migraine load over time, supporting the appropriateness of this therapeutic approach in clinical practice.

Indexed as

Migraine DisordersReceptors, Calcitonin Gene-Related PeptideCalcitonin Gene-Related PeptideDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansLigandsMaleMiddle AgedTreatment OutcomeCalcitonin Gene-Related PeptideLigandsReceptors, Calcitonin Gene-Related PeptideCalcitonin gene-related peptideChronic migraineErenumabFremanezumabRefractory migraine

Identifiers

PMID37430146
PMCPMC10480365
OpenAlexW4383815455

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.