Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37431333›Full record

ReviewCureus2023

Chondroitin Sulfate Supplements for Osteoarthritis: A Critical Review.

Rui Brito, Diogo Costa, Carina Dias, Patrícia Cruz, Paula Barros

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Coarse-Grained Martini 3 Model of Chondroitin Sulfate A.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Advanced nanoparticles in osteoarthritis treatment.Biomaterials translational · 2024
    Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rui BritoPhysical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Santo António, Porto, PRT.
Diogo CostaPhysical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Santo António, Porto, PRT.
Carina DiasPhysical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Santo António, Porto, PRT.
Patrícia CruzPhysical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Santo António, Porto, PRT.
Paula BarrosPhysical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Santo António, Porto, PRT.
Hospital de Santo António · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the years, chondroitin sulfate (CS) has been used as a slow-acting drug for the treatment of osteoarthritis, for the reduction of pain and improvement of function, and for its disease-modifying properties by limiting cartilage volume loss and joint space narrowing progression. However, there have been inconsistencies in published trials regarding clinical efficacy, with reports of a lack of significant effects compared to placebo. The therapeutic effects of chondroitin sulfate may depend on many variables, such as the source of origin, purity, and contamination with by-products. Another source of confusion may be related to the fact that CS is commonly combined with glucosamine, which makes it challenging to isolate the specific contribution of chondroitin to the therapeutic outcome. This is aggravated by the fact that CS supplements, used in many countries, are not regulated, and labels wrongly claim high levels of purity. Many of these inferior CS products may have been used in clinical trials, which may have had limited but significant results. This has led to recent recommendations to opt for higher-purity pharmacologic-grade CS for the treatment of OA. This article aims to provide an up-to-date view of the current literature regarding the biological effects and efficacy of CS and discusses the quality of available chondroitin sulfate supplements and the current direction in CS investigation. This review concludes that pharmacologic-grade CS supplements may have clinically significant benefits when properly standardized; however, high-quality evidence from properly designed clinical trials is still needed to draw definitive conclusions about clinical efficacy in osteoarthritis.

Indexed as

chondroitin sulfatechondroprotectionjoint healthosteoarthritissupplementation

Identifiers

PMID37431333
PMCPMC10329866
OpenAlexW4380082558

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.