Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37432608›Full record

ArticleGeroScience2024

A simple framework to distinguish 'individualistic' from a 'uniform rate' of ageing within or between study populations.

Hans Degens, Gladys L Onambélé-Pearson

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in GeroScience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Hans DegensDepartment of Life Sciences, Research Centre for Musculoskeletal Science & Sports Medicine, Institute of Sport, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK. h.degens@mmu.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-7399-4841
Gladys L Onambélé-PearsonDepartment of Sport and Exercise Science, Research Centre for Musculoskeletal Science & Sports Medicine, Institute of Sport, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1466-3265
Manchester Metropolitan University · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ageing is accompanied by a progressive decline in physiological functions. It is often argued that the rate of ageing differs between people and is 'highly individualistic'. This view is not unequivocally shared, and others have argued that the rate of ageing is rather 'uniform'. Distinguishing conclusively between these views requires longitudinal data, but these are difficult to obtain as they require decades of data collection from individuals. Here, a simple framework is proposed to assess in cross-sectional data whether in a given population the rate is 'highly individualistic' or rather 'uniform'. It is illustrated that an age-related decrease in the standard deviation (SD) of a certain parameter combined with a non-changing coefficient of variation (COVAR) reflects a 'uniform' rate of ageing, whilst an increase or decrease in COVAR with or without a concomitant increase in SD reflects a 'highly individualistic' rate of ageing. This framework is applied to some published data, focussing on muscle strength, power and physical function for the sake of illustration, and it is suggested that most studies do in fact show a 'highly individualistic' rate of ageing, perhaps apart from a 'uniform' rate of ageing in master athletes.

Indexed as

AgingMuscle StrengthCross-Sectional StudiesHumansAgeingIndividualisticRateUniform

Identifiers

PMID37432608
PMCPMC10828250
OpenAlexW4383872820

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.