Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37433173›Full record

Trial reportJournal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.)2023

Combined use of amlodipine and folic acid are significantly more efficacious than amlodipine alone in lowering plasma homocysteine and blood pressure among hypertensive patients with hyperhomocysteinemia and intolerance to ACEI: A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-controlled clinical trial.

Huihui Bao, Xiao Huang, Ping Li, Changsheng Sheng, Jin Zhang, Zhirong Wang, Demin Song, Lihua Hu, Congcong Ding, Zaihua Cheng and 9 more

Open access · diamondAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Effect of vitamin BBMJ open · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 9 institutions in 2 countries.

Huihui BaoDepartment of Cardiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Xiao HuangDepartment of Cardiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.ORCID 0000-0003-0686-6318
Ping LiDepartment of Cardiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Changsheng ShengThe Shanghai Institute of Hypertension, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0003-2685-0663
Jin ZhangThe Shanghai Institute of Hypertension, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Zhirong WangAffiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical College, Xuzhou, China.
Demin SongAnqing Municipal Hospital, Anqing, China.
Lihua HuDepartment of Cardiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Congcong DingDepartment of Cardiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Zaihua ChengDepartment of Cardiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Chen YaoPeking University Clinical Research Institute, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing, China.
Guangliang ChenCollege of Integrated Chinese and Western Medicine, Anhui University of Chinese Medicine, Hefei, China.
Yimin CuiDepartment of Pharmacy, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Xianhui QinNational Clinical Research Study Center for Kidney Disease, the State Key Laboratory for Organ Failure Research, Renal Division, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7812-7982
Genfu TangSchool of Health Administration, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
Xiaobin WangDepartment of Population, Family and Reproductive Health, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Yong HuoDepartment of Cardiology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-5407-8773
Xiaoshu ChengDepartment of Cardiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Jiguang WangThe Shanghai Institute of Hypertension, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Nanchang University · CNPeking University · CNRuijin Hospital · CNAnhui Medical University · CNAnhui University of Traditional Chinese Medicine · CNAnqing City Hospital · CNJohns Hopkins University · USNanfang Hospital · CNXuzhou Medical College · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hyperhomocysteinemia with hypertension can synergistically increase the risk of stroke. The China stroke primary prevention trial showed that combining 0.8 mg folic acid (FA) with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) can effectively lower plasma total homocysteine (tHcy) and blood pressure (BP); and reduce first stroke risk by additional 21% compared to ACEI alone. However, intolerance to ACEI is common in Asians and amlodipine can be alternative. This is a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-controlled clinical trial (RCT) which evaluated whether amlodipine combined with FA is more efficacious than amlodipine alone in lowering tHcy and BP among Chinese hypertensive with hyperhomocysteinemia and intolerance to ACEI. 351 Eligible patients were randomly assigned by 1:1:1 ratio to receive amlodipine-FA tablet daily (amlodipine 5 mg/FA 0.4 mg, A group); amlodipine 5 mg/FA 0.8 mg tablet daily (B group); amlodipine 5 mg daily (C group, control group). Follow-up was conducted at 2, 4, 6, and 8 weeks. The primary outcome was efficacy of lowering both tHcy and BP at the end of 8-week treatment. Compared with C group, A group had a significantly higher rate of lowering both tHcy and BP (23.3% vs. 6.0%; Odds Ratio [OR], 8.68; 95% CI, 3.04-24.78, P < .001); B group also had a higher rate of lowering both tHcy and BP (20.3% vs. 6.0%; OR: 5.90; 95% CI, 2.11-16.47, P < .001). This RCT showed amlodipine combined with FA compared with amlodipine alone, each had significantly higher efficacy of lowering both tHcy and BP. No difference was found in BP-lowering and occurrence of adverse events between the three groups.

Indexed as

HyperhomocysteinemiaHypertensionStrokeAmlodipineAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsBlood PressureDouble-Blind MethodFolic AcidHomocysteineHumansTreatment OutcomeAmlodipineAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsFolic AcidHomocysteineamlodipine-folic acidblood pressurehypertension with hyperhomocysteinemiarandomized clinical trialtotal homocysteine

Identifiers

PMID37433173
PMCPMC10423753
OpenAlexW4383894789

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.