ArticleJournal of inflammation research2023
Endothelial-Related Biomarkers in Evaluation of Vascular Function During Progression of Sepsis After Severe Trauma: New Potential Diagnostic Tools in Sepsis.
Article in Journal of inflammation research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- The cellular response capacity (CRC) as a novel immunomonitoring approach in sepsis.Military Medical Research · 2026Article
- Identifying early predictive and diagnostic biomarkers and exploring metabolic pathways for sepsis after trauma based on an untargeted metabolomics approach.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Identifying biomarkers deciphering sepsis from trauma-induced sterile inflammation and trauma-induced sepsis.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study aimed to investigate the changes in endothelial-related biomarkers and their relationship with the incidence and prognosis of patients with sepsis after severe trauma. Methods: A total of 37 severe trauma patients admitted to our hospital from Jan. to Dec. 2020 were enrolled in our research. All enrolled patients were divided into the sepsis and the non-sepsis groups. Endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs), circulating endothelial cells (CECs), and endothelial microparticles (EMPs) were detected on admission time; 24-48 hours and 48-72 hours after admission respectively. Demographic data, Acute Physiology, Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II, and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score were calculated every 24 h of admission to assess the severity of organ dysfunction. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were drawn to compare the areas under the curve (AUC) of endothelial-related biomarkers for the diagnosis of sepsis. Results: The incidence rate of sepsis was 45.95% in all patients. The SOFA score in the sepsis group was significantly higher than that in the non-sepsis group (2 points vs 0 points, P<0.01). The number of EPCs, CECs, and EMPs all rose quickly in the early phase after trauma. The number of EPCs was similar in both groups, but the number of CECs and EMPs in the Sepsis Group was much higher than in the non-Sepsis Group (all P<0.01). Logistic regression analysis showed that the occurrence of sepsis was closely related to the expression of 0-24h CECs and 0-24h EMPs. The AUC ROC for CECs in different time periods were 0.815, 0.877, and 0.882, respectively (all P<0.001). The AUC ROC for EMPs in 0-24h was 0.868 (P=0.005). Conclusion: The expression of EMPs was higher in early severe trauma, and high levels of EMPs were significantly higher in patients with early sepsis and poor prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.