ArticleJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2023
Prognosis of colon cancer patients based on enhancer RNAs-related genes.
Article in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeColon cancer (CC) is a cancer of the large intestine with high prevalence and poor prognosis. enhancer RNAs. Therefore, valuable tools or biomarkers for predicting patient status, directing clinical practice, and reducing overtreatment are needed. Enhancer RNAs (eRNAs), a class of noncoding RNAs transcribed from enhancers, have been shown to function as regulators of oncogene or tumor suppressor gene expression. The aim of our study was to explore the potential roles of eRNAs and their target enhancer-related genes (ERGs) in the prognosis of CC.
methodsSelected CC cases (stage I-III) from The Cancer Genome Atlas database were used as a training set, and cases from the Gene Expression Omnibus were used as the validation set. ERGs associated with prognosis were screened through three steps: potential, candidate, and prognosis ERGs. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis was used to identify independent prognostic factors, and a nomogram was created. Calibration curves were drawn by comparing predicted and observed survival probability. For validation, the calibration curves and ROC analysis were also applied to two external validation sets. The biological significance and clinical application of the genes obtained were investigated.
resultsBased on the multiple tiers of strict screening, 11 prognostic ERGs were obtained, which were combined to obtain a prognosis signature. A compound nomogram integrating age, TNM classification, and the prognostic signature was constructed. The model was reliable in distinguishing the risk of patients with stage I-III CC, with AUCs of 0.78 and 0.70 at 5 and 7 years, respectively. There was good reproducibility in calibration curves. The prognostic model also yielded good prediction capability in the validation sets.
conclusionIn this study, the usefulness and specificity of the ERGs in prognosis were described, which should be considered a key feature in the clinical guidance of CC patients with early stage. We concluded that the major implications of the eRNAs and ERGs should be valued, which would be an emerging hallmark in the prognosis of cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.