Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37440582›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2023

The Aedes aegypti RNA interference response against Zika virus in the context of co-infection with dengue and chikungunya viruses.

Mayke Leggewie, Christina Scherer, Mine Altinli, Rommel J Gestuveo, Vattipally B Sreenu, Janina Fuss, Marie Vazeille, Laurence Mousson, Marlis Badusche, Alain Kohl and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Viruses · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Dicer-2 mutations inThe Journal of general virology · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Mayke LeggewieBernhard-Nocht Institute for Tropical Medicine, Hamburg, Germany.
Christina SchererBernhard-Nocht Institute for Tropical Medicine, Hamburg, Germany.
Mine AltinliBernhard-Nocht Institute for Tropical Medicine, Hamburg, Germany.
Rommel J GestuveoMRC-University of Glasgow Centre for Virus Research, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Vattipally B SreenuMRC-University of Glasgow Centre for Virus Research, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Janina FussInstitute of Clinical Molecular Biology (IKMB), Kiel University, Kiel, Germany.
Marie VazeilleInstitut Pasteur, Université Paris Cité, Arboviruses and Insect Vectors, Paris, France.
Laurence MoussonInstitut Pasteur, Université Paris Cité, Arboviruses and Insect Vectors, Paris, France.
Marlis BaduscheBernhard-Nocht Institute for Tropical Medicine, Hamburg, Germany.
Alain KohlMRC-University of Glasgow Centre for Virus Research, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Anna-Bella FaillouxInstitut Pasteur, Université Paris Cité, Arboviruses and Insect Vectors, Paris, France.
Esther SchnettlerBernhard-Nocht Institute for Tropical Medicine, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8141-3728
German Center for Infection Research · DEInstitut Pasteur · FRMRC University of Glasgow Centre for Virus Research · GBBernhard Nocht Institute for Tropical Medicine · DEChristian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel · DEUniversity of the Philippines Visayas · PH

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UU_00034/4Medical Research Council MC_UU_12014/8
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since its detection in 2015 in Brazil, Zika virus (ZIKV) has remained in the spotlight of international public health and research as an emerging arboviral pathogen. In addition to single infection, ZIKV may occur in co-infection with dengue (DENV) and chikungunya (CHIKV) viruses, with whom ZIKV shares geographic distribution and the mosquito Aedes aegypti as a vector. The main mosquito immune response against arboviruses is RNA interference (RNAi). It is unknown whether or not the dynamics of the RNAi response differ between single arboviral infections and co-infections. In this study, we investigated the interaction of ZIKV and DENV, as well as ZIKV and CHIKV co-infections with the RNAi response in Ae. aegypti. Using small RNA sequencing, we found that the efficiency of small RNA production against ZIKV -a hallmark of antiviral RNAi-was mostly similar when comparing single and co-infections with either DENV or CHIKV. Silencing of key antiviral RNAi proteins, showed no change in effect on ZIKV replication when the cell is co-infected with ZIKV and DENV or CHIKV. Interestingly, we observed a negative effect on ZIKV replication during CHIKV co-infection in the context of Ago2-knockout cells, though his effect was absent during DENV co-infection. Overall, this study provides evidence that ZIKV single or co-infections with CHIKV or DENV are equally controlled by RNAi responses. Thus, Ae. aegypti mosquitoes and derived cells support co-infections of ZIKV with either CHIKV or DENV to a similar level than single infections, as long as the RNAi response is functional.

Indexed as

AedesArbovirusesChikungunya FeverChikungunya virusCoinfectionDengueZika VirusZika Virus InfectionAnimalsMosquito VectorsRNA Interference

Identifiers

PMID37440582
PMCPMC10343070
OpenAlexW4384155686

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.