ArticleCancers2023
Artificial Intelligence-Based Hazard Detection in Robotic-Assisted Single-Incision Oncologic Surgery.
Article in Cancers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- AI-based automated bleeding monitoring in conventional and robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery: a systematic review.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Clear Vision, Clear Savings: Enhancing Efficiency in Minimally Invasive Surgery.JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic SurgeonsPooled it
- Deep learning-based real-time intraoperative detection of thoracic duct.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Accuracy and Reliability of Artificial Intelligence in Surgical Decision-Making: A Literature Review.Cureus · 2025Review
- Artificial Intelligence and Digital Tools Across the Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgical Pathway: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Review
- A Deep Learning-Based Detection and Segmentation System for Multimodal Ultrasound Images in the Evaluation of Superficial Lymph Node Metastases.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence: revolutionizing robotic surgery: review.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2024Review
- Unveiling the Evolution of Virtual Reality in Medicine: A Bibliometric Analysis of Research Hotspots and Trends over the Past 12 Years.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Photonics-powered augmented reality skin electronics for proactive healthcare: multifaceted opportunities.Mikrochimica acta · 2024Review
- Artificial Intelligence, the Digital Surgeon: Unravelling Its Emerging Footprint in Healthcare - The Narrative Review.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
the problemSingle-incision surgery is a complex procedure in which any additional information automatically collected from the operating field can be of significance. While the use of robotic devices has greatly improved surgical outcomes, there are still many unresolved issues. One of the major surgical complications, with higher occurrence in cancer patients, is intraoperative hemorrhages, which if detected early, can be more efficiently controlled.
aimThis paper proposes a hazard detection system which incorporates the advantages of both Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Augmented Reality (AR) agents, capable of identifying, in real-time, intraoperative bleedings, which are subsequently displayed on a Hololens 2 device.
methodsThe authors explored the different techniques for real-time processing and determined, based on a critical analysis, that YOLOv5 is one of the most promising solutions. An innovative, real-time, bleeding detection system, developed using the YOLOv5 algorithm and the Hololens 2 device, was evaluated on different surgical procedures and tested in multiple configurations to obtain the optimal prediction time and accuracy.
resultsThe detection system was able to identify the bleeding occurrence in multiple surgical procedures with a high rate of accuracy. Once detected, the area of interest was marked with a bounding box and displayed on the Hololens 2 device. During the tests, the system was able to differentiate between bleeding occurrence and intraoperative irrigation; thus, reducing the risk of false-negative and false-positive results.
conclusionThe current level of AI and AR technologies enables the development of real-time hazard detection systems as efficient assistance tools for surgeons, especially in high-risk interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.